Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12490642›Full record

SynthesisJournal of epidemiology and community health2003

Health impact assessment of housing improvements: incorporating research evidence.

H Thomson, M Petticrew, M Douglas

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Wellbeing impacts of city policies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2014
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Household disrepair and the mental health of low-income urban women.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2011
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The design of housing and shelter programs: the social and environmental determinants of inequalities.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2007
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Community experiences and perceptions related to demolition and gut rehabilitation of houses for urban redevelopment.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2005
    Article
  19. The role of the built environment in the disablement process.American journal of public health · 2005
    Article
  20. Enhancing the evidence base for health impact assessment.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2004
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

H ThomsonMRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Glasgow, UK. hilary@msoc.mrc.gla.ac.uk
M Petticrew
M Douglas

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth impact assessment (HIA) has been widely recommended for future social policies and investment, such as housing improvement. However, concerns have been raised about the utility and predictive value of an HIA. Use of existing research data would add more weight to forecasts by an HIA. METHODS, RESULTS, and

conclusionsA recent systematic review of housing intervention studies found a lack of research. The authors recommended that a broader evidence base would be needed to support HIA. In response to consultation with policymakers and HIA practitioners this paper presents a way in which research can be used to inform HIA. Based on the systematic review, the authors have developed a table of synthesised findings indicating the expected health effects of specific housing improvements. The authors also reviewed observational data of housing associated health risks to highlight the key impacts to consider when doing a housing HIA. The findings are presented and the authors discuss how they should be used to inform evidence based housing HIA. In addition to considering the existing research, HIA must consider the local relevance of research. Consultation with local stakeholders also needs to be incorporated to the final assessment. The lack of data and the difficulties in gathering and reviewing data mean that not all HIAs will be able to be informed by research evidence. Well conducted prospective validation of HIAs would contribute to the development of healthy housing investment by informing future housing HIA.

Indexed as

Environmental HealthHealth PolicyHealth Status IndicatorsEvidence-Based MedicineHousingHumansPredictive Value of TestsPublic HealthResearchSocioeconomic FactorsUrban Renewal

Identifiers

PMID12490642
PMCPMC1732281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.