Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12488587›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedicine & biotechnology2002

Homologous Recombination and Its Role in Carcinogenesis.

Alexander J. R. Bishop, Robert H. Schiestl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. RNA-Based Classification of Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Racially Diverse Patients with Breast Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Genomic Instability and Cancer Risk Associated with Erroneous DNA Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Human Hazard Assessment UsingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexander J. R. Bishop
Robert H. Schiestl

Funding

ATM, P53, GADD45 AND P21 EFFECTS ON RECOMBINATIONR01ES009519 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SCHIESTL, ROBERT H · 1999 to 2009
$2.7M
INVOLVEMENT OF P53 AND ATM IN HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATIONF32GM019147 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI BISHOP, ALEXANDER JAMES · 1997 to 1999
–
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES009519NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM019147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer develops when cells no longer follow their normal pattern of controlled growth. In the absence or disregard of such regulation, resulting from changes in their genetic makeup, these errant cells acquire a growth advantage, expanding into precancerous clones. Over the last decade, many studies have revealed the relevance of genomic mutation in this process, be it by misreplication, environmental damage, or a deficiency in repairing endogenous and exogenous damage. Here, we discuss homologous recombination as another mechanism that can result in a loss of heterozygosity or genetic rearrangements. Some of these genetic alterations may play a primary role in carcinogenesis, but they are more likely to be involved in secondary and subsequent steps of carcinogenesis by which recessive oncogenic mutations are revealed. Patients, whose cells display an increased frequency of recombination, also have an elevated frequency of cancer, further supporting the link between recombination and carcinogenesis.

Identifiers

PMID12488587
PMCPMC153790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.