Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12482525›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2002

Antibody manufacture in transgenic animals and comparisons with other systems.

Louis Marie Houdebine

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Development of a Mucus Gland Bioreactor in LoachInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Expression of recombinant vaccines and antibodies in plants.Monoclonal antibodies in immunodiagnosis and immunotherapy · 2014
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Aberrant phenotypes of transgenic mice expressing dimeric human erythropoietin.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2012
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Production of pharmaceutical proteins by transgenic animals.Comparative immunology, microbiology and infectious diseases · 2009
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Cell engineering and molecular pharming for biopharmaceuticals.The open medicinal chemistry journal · 2008
    Article
  15. Preparation of recombinant vaccines.Biotechnology annual review · 2007
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Use of transgenic animals to improve human health and animal production.Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene · 2005
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Louis Marie HoudebineBiologie du Développement et Biotechnologies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, 78352 Cedex, Jouy-en-Josas, France. houdebine@diamant.jouy.inra.fr

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various forms of recombinant monoclonal antibodies are being used increasingly, mainly for therapeutic purposes. The isolation and engineering of the corresponding genes is becoming less of a bottleneck in the process; however, the production of recombinant antibodies is itself a limiting factor and a shortage is expected in the coming years. Milk from transgenic animals appears to be one of the most attractive sources of recombinant antibodies. None of the production systems presently implemented (CHO cells, insect cells infected by baculovirus, or transgenic animals and plants) has yet been optimized. This review describes the advantages of using milk for antibody production in comparison with the other systems.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibody FormationHumansMiceMilkPlants, Genetically ModifiedProtein EngineeringAntibodies, Monoclonal

Identifiers

PMID12482525
PMCPMC7134875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.