Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12480850›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2002

Self help smoking cessation in pregnancy: cluster randomised controlled trial.

Laurence Moore, Rona Campbell, Amanda Whelan, Nicola Mills, Phillippa Lupton, Elizabeth Misselbrook, Julie Frohlich

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Print-based self-help interventions for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Population-based study of smoking behaviour throughout pregnancy and adverse perinatal outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2013
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Evaluating decision aids--where next?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2004
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Laurence MooreCardiff University School of Social Sciences, Cardiff CF10 3WT. MooreL1@cf.ac.uk
Rona Campbell
Amanda Whelan
Nicola Mills
Phillippa Lupton
Elizabeth Misselbrook
Julie Frohlich
University of Bristol · GBCardiff University · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBPoole Hospital · GBSt Michael's Hospital · GBUniversity of the West of England · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of a self help approach to smoking cessation in pregnancy.

designPragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial with community midwife as the unit of randomisation.

settingThree NHS hospital trusts in England.

participants1527 women who smoked at the start of pregnancy.

interventionA series of five self help booklets comprising a step by step programme to increase motivation for quitting smoking and to teach strategies for cessation and relapse prevention. The first booklet was given to the women by a midwife at the earliest opportunity in antenatal care, together with a booklet for partners, family members, and friends. The remaining four booklets were mailed directly to the women.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was smoking cessation validated by cotinine measurement at the end of the second trimester of pregnancy. Other outcomes were self reported smoking status and cigarette consumption among daily smokers. Qualitative data exploring the acceptability of the intervention and the way that smoking cessation advice was delivered in both trial arms were also collected.

resultsSmoking cessation rates were low: the cotinine validated rates were 18.8% (113/600) in the intervention group and 20.7% (144/695) in the normal care group (difference 1.9%, 95% confidence intervals -3.5% to 7.3%). Self reported quit rates were higher. In the intervention group, 156 (25.6%) women reported not smoking for at least seven days, compared with 207 (29.1%) in the normal care group. In both groups, median self reported daily cigarette consumption among daily smokers was 10 cigarettes per day. Pregnant women and midwives approved of the intervention, but the way in which it was delivered varied considerably. For the primary smoking outcome, the degree of clustering at the midwife level was non-trivial (intracluster correlation coefficient 0.031).

conclusionThe self help intervention was acceptable but ineffective when implemented during routine antenatal care. More intensive and complex interventions, appropriately targeted and tailored, need to be developed and evaluated. Validated smoking cessation rates among pregnant women are substantially lower than the self reported rates on which current smoking policy is based.

Indexed as

Smoking PreventionCluster AnalysisDelivery of Health CareFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMidwiferyPamphletsPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal CarePrognosisSelf CareSmoking Cessation

Identifiers

PMID12480850
PMCPMC138509
OpenAlexW2061048644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.