ArticleProceedings. AMIA Symposium2002
Neural networks morbidity and mortality modeling during loss of HIV T-cell homeostasis.
Article in Proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The predictive accuracy of machine learning for the risk of death in HIV patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Neural network-longitudinal assessment of the Electronic Anti-Retroviral THerapy (EARTH) cohort to follow response to HIV-treatment.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the proven clinical benefits of HAART, mortality may still occur; particularly in those with less than 50 CD4+ cells/mL and, in some cases, with a viral burden below detectable plasma levels of HIV-1 RNA. Multiple factors may predict mortality including initial response to therapy, viral factors and host immune parameters. Due to the complexity of this problem, we developed Artificial Intelligence based tools/Neural Network (NN) to optimally evaluate outcomes of therapy and predict morbidity and mortality. To further validate the accuracy of these tools, we challenged their performance with that of Cox regression modeling (RM). Our study population involved 116 HIV+ individuals who consistently maintained CD4+ count < 50 cells/mL for over 6 months. All patients were treated with antiretrovirals. To assess clinical outcomes, we developed a feedforward back-propagation Neural Network. We then compared the performance of this network to a Cox regression model. The Neural Network outscored the Cox regression model in the ROC curve areas: 0.888 vs 0.760 (HIV+ first Seropositivity to AIDS), 0.901 vs 0.758 (HIV+ first Seropositivity to Last Assessment incl. death) and 0.832 vs 0.799 (AIDS to Last Assessment incl. death), for the NN & Cox, respectively. In patients with a history of AIDS defining events and with severe T-Cell depletion, mortality occurs despite therapy. Although Neural Networks and Cox modeling were successful in predicting mortality, the Neural Network was superior in assessing risk in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12463839PMC2244157W2289974467What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.