Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12463822›Full record

ArticleProceedings. AMIA Symposium2002

Implementation of a classification hierarchy for the GeneTests/GeneClinics genetic testing databases.

J Edwards, P Tarczy-Hornoch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Design of Genetics Home Reference: a new NLM consumer health resource.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J EdwardsPediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
P Tarczy-Hornoch

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The combination of a) our changing understanding of genotypic and phenotypic classification of diseases and b) the rapid growth and expansion of the number of entries in two databases targeted toward clinicians resulted in the need to develop a flexible dynamic hierarchical classification system for genetic disorders. The two databases making use of this classification schemas are the GeneClinics (GC) database - www.geneclinics.org and the GeneTests (GT) database - www.genetests.org The GC and GT databases serve respsectively as the users manual and yellow pages of genetic testing. The GeneTests/GeneClinics (GT/GC) classification hierarchy is maintained as a simple set of parent/child relationships in a relational database. The hierarchy is generated in real time in response to a user request. It is not maintained as a set of members with relationships defined by characters that are parsed to determine the structure of the tree. The GT/GC classification hierarchy entries are handled as objects by the data maintenance and search tools and may have a number of attributes and associations that create a rich tool for defining and examining genetic disorders

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGenetic TestingGenetic Diseases, InbornGenotypeHumansPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID12463822
PMCPMC2244282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.