Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12462413›Full record

ReviewNeurochemical research2002

Expression profiling following traumatic brain injury: a review.

Paolo G Marciano, James H Eberwine, Ramesh Ragupathi, Kathryn E Saatman, David F Meaney, Tracy K McIntosh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurochemical research, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paolo G MarcianoDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
James H Eberwine
Ramesh Ragupathi
Kathryn E Saatman
David F Meaney
Tracy K McIntosh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) elicits a complex sequence of putative autodestructive and neuroprotective cellular cascades. It is hypothesized that the genomic responses of cells in the injured brain serve as the basis for these cascades. Traditional methods for analyzing differential gene expression following brain trauma demonstrate that immediate early genes, cytokines, transcription factors, and neurotrophic factors can all participate in the brain's active and directed response to injury, and may do so concurrently. It is this complexity and multiplicity of interrelated molecular mechanisms that has demanded new methods for comprehensive and parallel evaluation of putative as well as novel gene targets. Recent advances in DNA microarray technology have enabled the simultaneous evaluation of thousands of genes and the subsequent generation of massive amounts of biological data relevant to CNS injury. This emerging technology can serve to further current knowledge regarding recognized molecular cascades as well as to identify novel molecular mechanisms that occur throughout the post-traumatic period. The elucidation of the complex alterations in gene expression underlying the pathological sequelae following TBI is of central importance in the design of future therapeutic agents.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisAnimalsBrain InjuriesHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.