Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12460220›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2002

"Well, have I got cancer or haven't I?" The psycho-social issues for women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Simone De Morgan, Sally Redman, Kate J White, Burcu Cakir, John Boyages

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Quality of life issues in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Recommendations to improve patient-centred care for ductal carcinoma in situ: Qualitative focus groups with women.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Development and pilot testing of a communication aid to assist clinicians to communicate with women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2011
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Quality-of-life issues in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2010
    Review
  16. Adherence to long-term surveillance mammography among women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2009
    Article
  17. Informed decision making before initiating screening mammography: does it occur and does it make a difference?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2008
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Simone De MorganNHMRC National Breast Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia. simoned@nbcc.org.au
Sally Redman
Kate J White
Burcu Cakir
John Boyages

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore women's experience of being diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in relation to the following: response to the diagnosis; understanding about the diagnosis; satisfaction with information; satisfaction with the level of involvement in treatment decision-making and satisfaction with support services.

designAn explorative descriptive qualitative design was used to facilitate an in-depth exploration of women's experiences. SETTING AND

participantsFive focus group interviews were conducted in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, involving 26 women diagnosed with DCIS.

resultsDCIS is a non-invasive breast disease, that in most cases will not recur if treated, and cannot of itself metastasize to other parts of the body. However, this study found that women were confused about whether or not they had cancer that could result in death. Women's confusion was compounded by the use of the term "carcinoma" and by the recommendation of treatments such as mastectomy. Women's confusion was not alleviated by appropriate information, with most women reporting dissatisfaction with the information they received specifically about DCIS.

conclusionsThis study identifies that a diagnosis of DCIS has a significant psychological impact on women. The communication challenges highlighted in this study are not only relevant to DCIS but to any other disease in which the natural history is uncertain and the evidence about treatment effectiveness is still emerging. Further research is needed in areas such as DCIS to explore the difficulties experienced in doctor-patient communication and their impact on patient outcomes, and how to optimize doctor-patient communication.

Indexed as

Patient Education as TopicPatient SatisfactionSocial SupportAdultAgedAustraliaBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingDecision MakingFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Services ResearchHumansInformation ServicesMiddle AgedNational Health Programs

Identifiers

PMID12460220
PMCPMC5142722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.