ReviewMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR2002
Microbial biodiversity: approaches to experimental design and hypothesis testing in primary scientific literature from 1975 to 1999.
Review in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eukaryotic Cell Capture by Amplified MagneticFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Molecular studies of microbial community structure on stained pages of Leonardo da Vinci's Atlantic Codex.Microbial ecology · 2011Article
- Improving bioscience research reporting: The ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research.Journal of pharmacology & pharmacotherapeutics · 2010Article
- Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research.PLoS biology · 2010Review
- Molecular microbial analysis of lactobacillus strains isolated from the gut of calves for potential probiotic use.Veterinary medicine international · 2010Article
- Survey of the quality of experimental design, statistical analysis and reporting of research using animals.PloS one · 2009Article
- Monitoring exogenous and indigenous bacteria by PCR-DGGE technology during the process of microbial enhanced oil recovery.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2008Article
- Salmonella, Campylobacter and Enterococcus spp.: their antimicrobial resistance profiles and their spatial relationships in a synoptic study of the Upper Oconee River basin.Microbial ecology · 2008Article
- Molecular approaches: advantages and artifacts in assessing bacterial diversity.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2007Review
- Sponge-associated microorganisms: evolution, ecology, and biotechnological potential.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2007Review
- Validation of mixed-genome microarrays as a method for genetic discrimination.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2007Article
- Effect of agricultural management regime on Burkholderia community structure in soil.Microbial ecology · 2006Article
- Use of 16S rRNA gene terminal restriction fragment analysis to assess the impact of solids retention time on the bacterial diversity of activated sludge.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2005Article
- Filamentous fungi: the indeterminate lifestyle and microbial ecology.Microbial ecology · 2004Review
- Nitrous oxide reductase (nosZ) gene fragments differ between native and cultivated Michigan soils.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research interest in microbial biodiversity over the past 25 years has increased markedly as microbiologists have become interested in the significance of biodiversity for ecological processes and as the industrial, medical, and agricultural applications of this diversity have evolved. One major challenge for studies of microbial habitats is how to account for the diversity of extremely large and heterogeneous populations with samples that represent only a very small fraction of these populations. This review presents an analysis of the way in which the field of microbial biodiversity has exploited sampling, experimental design, and the process of hypothesis testing to meet this challenge. This review is based on a systematic analysis of 753 publications randomly sampled from the primary scientific literature from 1975 to 1999 concerning the microbial biodiversity of eight habitats related to water, soil, plants, and food. These publications illustrate a dominant and growing interest in questions concerning the effect of specific environmental factors on microbial biodiversity, the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of this biodiversity, and quantitative measures of population structure for most of the habitats covered here. Nevertheless, our analysis reveals that descriptions of sampling strategies or other information concerning the representativeness of the sample are often missing from publications, that there is very limited use of statistical tests of hypotheses, and that only a very few publications report the results of multiple independent tests of hypotheses. Examples are cited of different approaches and constraints to experimental design and hypothesis testing in studies of microbial biodiversity. To prompt a more rigorous approach to unambiguous evaluation of the impact of microbial biodiversity on ecological processes, we present guidelines for reporting information about experimental design, sampling strategies, and analyses of results in publications concerning microbial biodiversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.