ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2001
Population-based evaluation of the Ehrlichia ruminantium MAP 1B indirect ELISA.
Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection of Antibodies toMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Serological survey of antibodies to Ehrlichia ruminantium in small ruminants in Tanzania.Tropical animal health and production · 2009Article
- Identification of 19 polymorphic major outer membrane protein genes and their immunogenic peptides in Ehrlichia ewingii for use in a serodiagnostic assay.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2008Article
- Longitudinal monitoring of Ehrlichia ruminantium infection in Gambian lambs and kids by pCS20 PCR and MAP1-B ELISA.BMC infectious diseases · 2007Article
- Development of a polyclonal competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of antibodies to Ehrlichia ruminantium.Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology · 2003Article
- Detection by two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays of antibodies to Ehrlichia ruminantium in field sera collected from sheep and cattle in Ghana.Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The indirect MAP 1B ELISA based on the recombinant MAP 1B fragment of the immunodominant MAP I protein of Ehrlichia ruminantium is considered to be the most sensitive and specific assay for the serodiagnosis of heartwater. In this study, we evaluated its reliability in detecting exposure to E. ruminantium in field populations of domestic ruminants in Zimbabwe. Cattle and goat herds in endemically stable areas with high infection pressure and an expected close to 100% prevalence of E. ruminantium exposure were sampled. Bovine sera (858) and caprine sera (706) collected at seven locations representative of the two main production systems (communal lands and large scale commercial farms) in the two main agroecological zones of Zimbabwe (highveld and lowveld) were analysed. The prevalence of MAP 1B-specific antibodies in goats was similar and high, ranging from 67 to 100%, at all except one site (43%). Age-specific differences in goats (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years) were not observed. In contrast, MAP 1B seroprevalence in cattle was significantly lower (P < 0.001), ranging from 46 to 61% in the lowveld communal area and from 24 to 33% in the remaining areas (P < 0.001). Age-specific differences in seroprevalence (1, 2, 3, 4, 5-7 + years) were similarly not evident in cattle (P < 0.15). Hence, the indirect MAP 1B ELISA may be an unreliable indicator of past exposure to heartwater in field-infected cattle in Zimbabwe. Although the reasons for this low response in field cattle are not fully understood, this study illustrates the need for field validation of the performance of new diagnostic tests prior to their use for epidemiological purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.