ArticleGenetics2002
How intron splicing affects the deletion and insertion profile in Drosophila melanogaster.
Article in Genetics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The evolutionary dynamics that retain long neutral genomic sequences in face of indel deletion bias: a model and its application to human introns.Open biology · 2022Article
- Intron and gene size expansion during nervous system evolution.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- New Methods for Inferring the Distribution of Fitness Effects for INDELs and SNPs.Molecular biology and evolution · 2018Article
- Rapid Generation of Human Genetic Loss-of-Function iPSC Lines by Simultaneous Reprogramming and Gene Editing.Stem cell reports · 2017Article
- Stabilizing selection, purifying selection, and mutational bias in finite populations.Genetics · 2013Article
- On the utility of short intron sequences as a reference for the detection of positive and negative selection in Drosophila.Molecular biology and evolution · 2010Article
- Ubiquitous selective constraints in the Drosophila genome revealed by a genome-wide interspecies comparison.Genome research · 2006Article
- Insertion/deletion and nucleotide polymorphism data reveal constraints in Drosophila melanogaster introns and intergenic regions.Genetics · 2005Article
- Benchmarking tools for the alignment of functional noncoding DNA.BMC bioinformatics · 2004Article
- The regulatory content of intergenic DNA shapes genome architecture.Genome biology · 2004Article
- Selective constraints on intron evolution in Drosophila.Genetics · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies of "dead-on-arrival" transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster found that deletions outnumber insertions approximately 8:1 with a median size for deletions of approximately 10 bp. These results are consistent with the deletion and insertion profiles found in most other Drosophila pseudogenes. In contrast, a recent study of D. melanogaster introns found a deletion/insertion ratio of 1.35:1, with 84% of deletions being shorter than 10 bp. This discrepancy could be explained if deletions, especially long deletions, are more frequently strongly deleterious than insertions and are eliminated disproportionately from intron sequences. To test this possibility, we use analysis and simulations to examine how deletions and insertions of different lengths affect different components of splicing and determine the distribution of deletions and insertions that preserve the original exons. We find that, consistent with our predictions, longer deletions affect splicing at a much higher rate compared to insertions and short deletions. We also explore other potential constraints in introns and show that most of these also disproportionately affect large deletions. Altogether we demonstrate that constraints in introns may explain much of the difference in the pattern of deletions and insertions observed in Drosophila introns and pseudogenes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.