ArticleGenetics2002
A genetic screen for suppressors and enhancers of the Drosophila cdk1-cyclin B identifies maternal factors that regulate microtubule and microfilament stability.
Article in Genetics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Elevated temperature fatally disrupts nuclear divisions in the early Drosophila embryo.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Topological interactions drive the first fate decision in theNature physics · 2025Article
- Nuclear speed and cycle length co-vary with local density during syncytial blastoderm formation in a cricket.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Modulating the bicoid gradient in space and time.Hereditas · 2021Article
- The Mediator CDK8-Cyclin C complex modulates Dpp signaling in Drosophila by stimulating Mad-dependent transcription.PLoS genetics · 2020Article
- Profilin 1 associates with stress granules and ALS-linked mutations alter stress granule dynamics.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014Article
- Argonaute-1 functions as a mitotic regulator by controlling Cyclin B during Drosophila early embryogenesis.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2014Article
- Changes in Ect2 localization couple actomyosin-dependent cell shape changes to mitotic progression.Developmental cell · 2012Article
- Formins in development: orchestrating body plan origami.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2010Review
- Article
- Drosophila Wee1 interacts with members of the gammaTURC and is required for proper mitotic-spindle morphogenesis and positioning.Current biology : CB · 2005Article
- Drosophila melanogaster Prat, a purine de novo synthesis gene, has a pleiotropic maternal-effect phenotype.Genetics · 2004Article
- Both cyclin B levels and DNA-replication checkpoint control the early embryonic mitoses in Drosophila.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2004Article
- l(3)malignant brain tumor and three novel genes are required for Drosophila germ-cell formation.Genetics · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Coordination between cell-cycle progression and cytoskeletal dynamics is important for faithful transmission of genetic information. In early Drosophila embryos, increasing maternal cyclin B leads to higher Cdk1-CycB activity, shorter microtubules, and slower nuclear movement during cycles 5-7 and delays in nuclear migration to the cortex at cycle 10. Later during cycle 14 interphase of six cycB embryos, we observed patches of mitotic nuclei, chromosome bridges, abnormal nuclear distribution, and small and large nuclei. These phenotypes indicate disrupted coordination between the cell-cycle machinery and cytoskeletal function. Using these sensitized phenotypes, we performed a dosage-sensitive genetic screen to identify maternal proteins involved in this process. We identified 10 suppressors classified into three groups: (1) gene products regulating Cdk1 activities, cdk1 and cyclin A; (2) gene products interacting with both microtubules and microfilaments, Actin-related protein 87C; and (3) gene products interacting with microfilaments, chickadee, diaphanous, Cdc42, quail, spaghetti-squash, zipper, and scrambled. Interestingly, most of the suppressors that rescue the astral microtubule phenotype also reduce Cdk1-CycB activities and are microfilament-related genes. This suggests that the major mechanism of suppression relies on the interactions among Cdk1-CycB, microtubule, and microfilament networks. Our results indicate that the balance among these different components is vital for normal early cell cycles and for embryonic development. Our observations also indicate that microtubules and cortical microfilaments antagonize each other during the preblastoderm stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.