Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12452824›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental immunology2002

Discovery of immunopotentiatory drugs: current and future strategies.

J Rhodes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Immunomodulatory effects ofExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2014
    Article
  7. Successful treatment of lower eyelid melanoma in situ.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2014
    Article
  8. Therapeutic strategies to alter the oxygen affinity of sickle hemoglobin.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2014
    Review
  9. Gold nanorod delivery of an ssRNA immune activator inhibits pandemic H1N1 influenza viral replication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

J RhodesDepartment of Gene and Protein Therapeutics, Glaxo Smith Kline Research and Development, Medicines Research Centre, Stevenage, UK. John.R.Rhodes@gsk.com

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicDrosophila ProteinsDrug DesignISCOMsAminoquinolinesAnimalsAntigen-Presenting CellsBenzaldehydesBenzoatesHumansImiquimodMembrane GlycoproteinsReceptors, Cell SurfaceTh1 CellsToll-Like ReceptorsAdjuvants, ImmunologicAminoquinolinesBenzaldehydesBenzoatesDrosophila ProteinsImiquimodISCOMsMembrane GlycoproteinsReceptors, Cell SurfaceToll-Like Receptorstucaresol

Identifiers

PMID12452824
PMCPMC1906540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.