ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2002
The risks of waiting for cardiac catheterization: a prospective study.
Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of Levels of Specialized Care With Risk of Premature Mortality in Patients With Epilepsy.JAMA neurology · 2019Article
- Insight into capacity planning for cardiac catheterization services: policy lessons learned from "Looking in the Mirror" over a decade.Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2009Article
- Achieving global access to heart rhythm therapies in the next decade: a tangible goal.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2006Article
- Treating the right patient at the right time: access to specialist consultation and non-invasive testing.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2006Review
- Treating the right patient at the right time: Access to cardiac catheterization, percutaneous coronary intervention and cardiac surgery.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2006Review
- Determining optimal population rates of cardiac catheterization: a phantom alternative?CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2005Article
- Primary angioplasty for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: ready for prime time?CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2003Review
- Relative risks or odds ratios?CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2003Article
- The waiting game: facing the consequences.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFew large, systematic, prospective studies have documented the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients awaiting cardiac catheterization and the delays that they experience. The primary objective of this study was to quantify the waiting times, morbidity and mortality of patients waiting for catheterization. A secondary objective was to identify predictors of cardiac events that occur while patients are waiting.
methodsA computerized, prospective, central waiting list registry was developed at a regional centre in Hamilton, Ont., serving 2.2 million people in southern Ontario. Between Apr. 1, 1998, and Mar. 31, 2000, 8030 consecutive patients (4725 outpatients and 3305 inpatients) were referred for cardiac catheterization. Major cardiac outcomes while on the waiting list (death, myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure) were documented prospectively and related to requested versus actual waiting time.
resultsMost of the referrals (7345 [91.5%]) were for a primary diagnosis of suspected coronary artery disease. The median waiting time was 6 (interquartile range [IQR] 4) days for inpatients and 60 (IQR 68) days for outpatients. Actual waiting times correlated with the waiting times requested by the referring physicians. However, only 37% of the procedures overall were completed within the requested waiting time. Of the 8030 patients, 50 (0.6%) died, 32 (0.4%) had a myocardial infarction and 41 (0.5%) experienced congestive heart failure. Overall, 109 patients (1.4%) had a major cardiac event, namely, death, myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure. These events occurred over a median wait of 27 days (2 days for inpatients and 35 days for outpatients), and over half (57%) occurred within the waiting time requested by the referring physician. In the multivariate analysis, predictors of the composite of death, myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure were increasing age (relative risk [RR] 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52-3.75) and New York Heart Association class III/IV symptoms (RR 2.86, 95% CI 1.11-7.33) in inpatients, and increasing age (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.12-1.66), aortic stenosis (RR 3.70, 95% CI 1.93-7.08) and left ventricular ejection fraction less than 35% (RR 4.35, 95% CI 2.48-7.61) in outpatients.
interpretationPatients awaiting cardiac catheterization may experience major adverse events, such as death, myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure, which may be preventable. Our findings provide a benchmark by which to measure the effect of increased capacity and prioritization schemes that allow earlier access for patients at higher risk, such as those with aortic stenosis and reduced left ventricular function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12451076PMC134132W1943273003What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.