Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12449415›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2002

High resolution 13C NMR spectra on oriented lipid bilayers: from quantifying the various sources of line broadening to performing 2D experiments with 0.2-0.3 ppm resolution in the carbon dimension.

O Soubias, O Saurel, V Réat, A Milon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

O SoubiasInstitut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, IPBS CNRS, Toulouse, France.
O Saurel
V Réat
A Milon

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

13C NMR spectra routinely performed on oriented lipid bilayers display linewidth of 1-2 ppm, although T2 measurements indicate that 0.1-0.2 ppm could be obtained. We have prepared a DMPC-13C4-cholesterol (7/3) sample, and oriented the lipid bilayers between glass plates so that the bilayer normal makes an angle of 90 degrees (or of the magic angle) with Bo. We have measured T2s, CSAs, and linewidths for the choline 13C-gamma-methyl, the cholesterol-C4 carbons and the lipid head group phosphorus, at both angles and 313 K. The magnetic field distribution within the sample was calculated using the surface current formalism. The line shapes were simulated as a function of Bo field inhomogeneities and sample mosaic spread. Both effects contribute to the experimental linewidth. Using three signals of different CSA, we have quantified both contributions and measured the mosaic spread accurately. Direct shimming on a sample signal is essential to obtain sharp resonances and 13C labelled choline methyl resonance of DMPC is a good candidate for this task. After optimisation of the important parameters (shimming on the choline resonance, mosaic spread of +/-0.30 degrees), 13C linewidth of 0.2-0.3 ppm have been obtained. This newly achieved resolution on bilayers oriented at 90 degrees, has allowed to perform two 2D experiments, with a good sensitivity: 2D PELF (correlation of carbon chemical shifts and C-H dipolar couplings) and 2D D-resolved experiment (correlation of carbon chemical shifts and C-C dipolar couplings). A C-C dipolar coupling of 35 +/- 2 Hz between the choline methyl carbons was determined.

Indexed as

AnisotropyCarbonCholesterolCholineDimyristoylphosphatidylcholineLipid BilayersLiposomesMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMolecular ConformationCarbonCholesterolCholineDimyristoylphosphatidylcholineLipid BilayersLiposomes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.