ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2002
Cross-competition in transgenic chloroplasts expressing single editing sites reveals shared cis elements.
Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conservation of the moss RNA editing factor PPR78 despite the loss of its known cytidine-to-uridine editing sites is explained by a hidden extra target.The Plant cell · 2024Article
- A novel tetratricopeptide repeat protein, WHITE TO GREEN1, is required for early chloroplast development and affects RNA editing in chloroplasts.Journal of experimental botany · 2017Article
- Small RNAs reveal two target sites of the RNA-maturation factor Mbb1 in the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Tetrapyrrole biosynthetic enzyme protoporphyrinogen IX oxidase 1 is required for plastid RNA editing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014Article
- An RNA recognition motif-containing protein is required for plastid RNA editing in Arabidopsis and maize.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013Article
- A pentatricopeptide repeat protein acts as a site-specificity factor at multiple RNA editing sites with unrelated cis-acting elements in plastids.Nucleic acids research · 2012Article
- The RNA editing pattern of cox2 mRNA is affected by point mutations in plant mitochondria.PloS one · 2011Article
- Natural variation in Arabidopsis leads to the identification of REME1, a pentatricopeptide repeat-DYW protein controlling the editing of mitochondrial transcripts.Plant physiology · 2010Article
- Editing site analysis in a gymnosperm mitochondrial genome reveals similarities with angiosperm mitochondrial genomes.Current genetics · 2010Article
- Reverse genetic screening identifies five E-class PPR proteins involved in RNA editing in mitochondria of Arabidopsis thaliana.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2010Article
- A study of new Arabidopsis chloroplast RNA editing mutants reveals general features of editing factors and their target sites.The Plant cell · 2009Article
- A comparative genomics approach identifies a PPR-DYW protein that is essential for C-to-U editing of the Arabidopsis chloroplast accD transcript.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2009Article
- CURE-Chloroplast: a chloroplast C-to-U RNA editing predictor for seed plants.BMC bioinformatics · 2009Article
- Post-transcriptional control of chloroplast gene expression.Gene regulation and systems biology · 2009Article
- A DYW domain-containing pentatricopeptide repeat protein is required for RNA editing at multiple sites in mitochondria of Arabidopsis thaliana.The Plant cell · 2009Article
- Pentatricopeptide repeat proteins with the DYW motif have distinct molecular functions in RNA editing and RNA cleavage in Arabidopsis chloroplasts.The Plant cell · 2009Article
- High conservation of a 5' element required for RNA editing of a C target in chloroplast psbE transcripts.Journal of molecular evolution · 2008Article
- Cross-competition in editing of chloroplast RNA transcripts in vitro implicates sharing of trans-factors between different C targets.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2008Article
- Article
- Faithful editing of a tomato-specific mRNA editing site in transgenic tobacco chloroplasts.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
RNA editing in organelles of angiosperm plants results in alteration of Cs to Us in transcripts. In most editing sites analyzed in vitro or in vivo, sequences within approximately 30 nucleotides (nt) 5' and 10 nt 3' of the edited C have been found to be required for selection of the correct C editing target and for editing efficiency, but no consensus sequences have been identified. The effect of high-level expression of two different minigenes carrying either the rpoB-2 or the ndhF-2 editing site on editing was determined for all 31 known edited Cs in two transgenic tobacco lines. The editing efficiencies of both the corresponding rpoB and ndhF editing sites in the endogenous genes' transcripts and in several other genes' transcripts were reduced in the chloroplast transgenic plants. Conserved nucleotides could be identified in the sequences immediately 5' of each overexpressed editing site and in the sites in the additional genes that experienced a competition effect, though the conserved nucleotides differ 5' of rpoB-2 and 5' of ndhF-2. Inspection of sequences surrounding chloroplast and mitochondrial editing sites reveals that they can be grouped into clusters which carry conserved nucleotides within 30 nt 5' of the C target of editing. The data are consistent with a model in which the same trans factor recognizes several chloroplast or mitochondrial editing sites, depending on the particular sequence 5' of the edited C.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.