Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12445032›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2002

A clinical audit of the prescribing of celecoxib and rofecoxib in Australian rural general practice.

Christopher Cutts, Adam LaCaze, Susan Tett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher CuttsQueensland Rural Medical Support Agency, 467 Enoggera Road, Alderley, Queensland 4051, Australia. christopher@qrmsa.com.au
Adam LaCaze
Susan Tett

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe new cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective inhibitors, celecoxib (Celebrex) and rofecoxib (Vioxx), have been widely prescribed since their launch. No reviews currently appear in the literature of prescribing patterns in Australia. This paper describes a self-audit of the clinical use of selective COX-2 inhibitor therapy undertaken with rural general practitioners (GPs) in Australia.

methodsA structured audit form was developed and distributed to interested GPs. The form was self-administered and focused on issues about COX-2 inhibitors and the types of patients who were receiving them, e.g. indications, patient demographics, risk factors and drug interactions.

resultsA total of 627 patients were recruited (569 celecoxib and 58 rofecoxib). A range of doses was prescribed. Osteoarthritis was the most common indication (68.1%). Risk factors known for the nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were identified in 65.1% of patients, with the most common being advanced age, hypertension and previous peptic ulcer disease. Potential drug interactions were common. A variety of reasons for initiation of therapy was identified; these included perceived increased efficacy, safety and failure of other treatment.

conclusionsThese results show that COX-2 inhibitors are being prescribed for patients with multiple risk factors that may place the patient at increased risk of adverse drug reactions to a COX-2 inhibitor. The perception of improved safety and efficacy was common and is of concern. Limitations of the study include the reliance on self-reporting.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCelecoxibCyclooxygenase 2Cyclooxygenase 2 InhibitorsCyclooxygenase InhibitorsDrug PrescriptionsFamily PracticeHumansIsoenzymesLactonesMedical AuditMembrane ProteinsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCelecoxibCyclooxygenase 2Cyclooxygenase 2 InhibitorsCyclooxygenase InhibitorsIsoenzymesLactonesMembrane ProteinsProstaglandin-Endoperoxide SynthasesPTGS2 protein, humanPyrazolesrofecoxibSulfonamidesSulfones

Identifiers

PMID12445032
PMCPMC1874451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.