Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12445024›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2002

Development and validation of limited sampling strategies for prediction of the systemic exposure to the novel anticancer agent E7070 (N-(3-chloro-7-indolyl)-1,4-benzenedisulphonamide).

Charlotte van Kesteren, R A A Mathôt, E Raymond, J P Armand, P Fumoleau, C Punt, M Ravic, J Wanders, J H Beijnen, J H M Schellens and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Limited Sampling Strategies to Estimate the Exposition of Different Lipid Nanocaspules.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Charlotte van KesterenDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Slotervaart Hospital, Louwesweg 6, 1066 EC Amsterdam, The Netherlands. c.vankesteren@apoth.azu.nl
R A A Mathôt
E Raymond
J P Armand
P Fumoleau
C Punt
M Ravic
J Wanders
J H Beijnen
J H M Schellens
Early Clinical Studies Group of the EORTC and NDDO Oncology
Slotervaartziekenhuis · NLInstitut Gustave Roussy · FREisai (United Kingdom) · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsE7070 is a novel, sulphonamide anticancer agent currently under clinical development for the treatment of solid tumours. The aim of this study was to develop and validate limited sampling strategies for the prediction of E7070 exposure in two different treatment schedules for phase II studies using the Bayesian estimation approach.

methodsData from two phase I dose finding studies were used in which E7070 was administered either as a single 1 h infusion or as a daily 1 h infusion for 5 days. Plasma concentration-time data from 75 patients were randomly divided into an index data set, used for the development of the strategies, and a validation data set. Population pharmacokinetic parameters were derived on the basis of the index data set. The D-optimality algorithm was used for the selection of optimal time points for both treatment schedules. The developed strategies were compared by assessment of their predictive performance of exposure, expressed as AUC (area under the plasma concentration vs time curve), in the validation data set.

resultsThe developed population pharmacokinetic model comprised three compartments, with saturable distribution to one peripheral compartment and both linear and saturable elimination from the central compartment. For the 1 h infusion, a four sample strategy was selected which resulted in unbiased and accurate predictions of AUC (bias 0.74%, precision 13%). A five sample strategy was generated for the daily times five schedule yielding unbiased (bias 3.2%) and precise (12% precision) predictions of AUC.

conclusionsOptimal sampling strategies were developed and validated for estimation of E7070 exposure in two different treatment schedules. Both schedules enabled accurate and unbiased predictions of AUC.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsArea Under CurveBayes TheoremChromatography, High Pressure LiquidDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansInfusions, IntravenousPredictive Value of TestsReference ValuesSampling StudiesSulfonamidesAntineoplastic AgentsN-(3-chloro-7-indolyl)-1,4-benzenedisulphonamideSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID12445024
PMCPMC1874478
OpenAlexW1546243186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.