Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12441388›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2002

Modifying specificity of antidigoxin antibodies using insertional mutagenesis.

Rustem A Krykbaev, Panayota Tsantili, Philip D Jeffrey, Michael N Margolies

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 90% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. In vitro evolution of antibody affinity via insertional scanning mutagenesis of an entire antibody variable region.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rustem A KrykbaevAntibody Engineering Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston 02114, USA.
Panayota Tsantili
Philip D Jeffrey
Michael N Margolies
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

SEQUENCE, SHAPE, AND SPECIFICITY OF ANTIBODIESR01CA024432 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MARGOLIES, MICHAEL N · 1985 to 2000
$426k
ENGINEERING OF ANTIDIGOXIN ANTIBODY COMBINING SITESR01HL047415 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MARGOLIES, MICHAEL N · 1992 to 1999
–
NCI NIH HHS CA24432NHLBI NIH HHS HL47415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Certain antibodies (Abs) elicited using the cardiac glycoside digoxin (digoxigenin tridigitoxoside) bind preferentially to analogs that differ from digoxin by substitutions on the cardenolide rings, the lactone, or by the presence or absence of attached sugars. Antibody 26-10 binds equally well to digoxin and digitoxin, which differ only by the presence in the former and the absence in the latter of an hydroxyl group at C12. Other antidigoxin Abs, however, can distinguish between these ligands by three orders of magnitude in binding. Inspection of the structure of Fab 26-10 complexed with digoxin shows a gap in complementarity in the region between the digoxin O12 and LCDR3. We proposed that insertions in LCDR3 might result in Abs that bind digitoxin preferentially. We produced libraries of mutants displayed on bacteriophage which were randomized at LCDR3 and contained LCDR3 insertions. Mutants were selected by panning against digoxin and analogs. The mutants bound digitoxin preferentially up to 47-fold greater than digoxin. The mutants that bound well to digitoxin demonstrated a consensus sequence including the substitution of Trp at position L:94. Using site-directed mutagenesis, the binding to digitoxin was shown to be maximized by the combination of an insertion and L:Trp94 mutation, moving the L 94 side chain closer to digoxin. We also selected mutants that bound preferentially to gitoxin, which, like digitoxin, lacks the 12-hydroxyl, increasing relative binding to gitoxin up to 600-fold compared to the unmutated Ab 26-10.

Indexed as

Antibody SpecificityMutagenesis, InsertionalAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalBase SequenceBinding Sites, AntibodyDigoxinMiceMolecular Sequence DataMutagenesis, Site-DirectedAntibodies, MonoclonalDigoxin

Identifiers

PMID12441388
PMCPMC2373741
OpenAlexW1964780015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.