Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12441382›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2002

Sequence conserved for subcellular localization.

Rajesh Nair, Burkhard Rost

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Wheat E3 ligasePhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Protein Sorting Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Computational methods for protein localization prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  11. A Methodology to Study Pseudogenized lincRNAs.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rajesh NairColumbia University Bioinformatics Center (CUBIC), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA.
Burkhard Rost

Funding

STRUCTURAL GENOMICS OF EUKARYOTIC MODEL ORGANISMSP50GM062413 · NIGMS · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI MONTELIONE, GAETANO T · 2000 to 2004
$33.5M
Intruding into the midnight zone of protein comparisonsR01GM063029 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ROST, BURKHARD · 2001 to 2004
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1-P50-GM62413-01NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM062413NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM063029NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM63029-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The more proteins diverged in sequence, the more difficult it becomes for bioinformatics to infer similarities of protein function and structure from sequence. The precise thresholds used in automated genome annotations depend on the particular aspect of protein function transferred by homology. Here, we presented the first large-scale analysis of the relation between sequence similarity and identity in subcellular localization. Three results stood out: (1) The subcellular compartment is generally more conserved than what might have been expected given that short sequence motifs like nuclear localization signals can alter the native compartment; (2) the sequence conservation of localization is similar between different compartments; and (3) it is similar to the conservation of structure and enzymatic activity. In particular, we found the transition between the regions of conserved and nonconserved localization to be very sharp, although the thresholds for conservation were less well defined than for structure and enzymatic activity. We found that a simple measure for sequence similarity accounting for pairwise sequence identity and alignment length, the HSSP distance, distinguished accurately between protein pairs of identical and different localizations. In fact, BLAST expectation values outperformed the HSSP distance only for alignments in the subtwilight zone. We succeeded in slightly improving the accuracy of inferring localization through homology by fine tuning the thresholds. Finally, we applied our results to the entire SWISS-PROT database and five entirely sequenced eukaryotes.

Indexed as

Conserved SequenceProtein Sorting SignalsAmino Acid SequenceCellsComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinProteinsProtein TransportProteinsProtein Sorting Signals

Identifiers

PMID12441382
PMCPMC2373743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.