Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12439736›Full record

ReviewThe pharmacogenomics journal2002

Sulfation through the looking glass--recent advances in sulfotransferase research for the curious.

M W H Coughtrie

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The pharmacogenomics journal, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 198 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Pharmacometabonomic identification of a significant host-microbiome metabolic interaction affecting human drug metabolism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Kinetic and quantitative analysis of [Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

M W H CoughtrieDepartment of Molecular & Cellular Pathology, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, UK. m.w.h.coughtrie@dundee.ac.uk
Ninewells Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Members of the cytosolic sulfotransferase (SULT) superfamily catalyse the sulfation of a multitude of xenobiotics, hormones and neurotransmitters. Humans have at least 10 functional SULT genes, and a number of recent advances reviewed here have furthered our understanding of SULT function. Analysis of expression patterns has shown that sulfotransferases are highly expressed in the fetus, and SULTs may in fact be a major detoxification enzyme system in the developing human. The X-ray crystal structures of three SULTs have been solved and combined with mutagenesis experiments and molecular modelling, they have provided the first clues as to the factors that govern the unique substrate specificities of some of these enzymes. In the future these and other studies will facilitate prediction of the fate of chemicals metabolised by sulfation. Variation in sulfation capacity may be important in determining an individual's response to xenobiotics, and there has been an explosion in information on sulfotransferase polymorphisms and their functional consequences, including the influence of SULT1A1 genotype on susceptibility to colorectal and breast cancer. Finally, the first gene knockout experiments with SULTs have recently been described, with the generation of estrogen sulfotransferase deficient mice in which reproductive capacity is compromised. Our improved understanding of these enzymes will have significant benefits in such diverse areas as drug design and development, cancer susceptibility, reproduction and development.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansPharmacogeneticsSulfotransferasesTechnology, PharmaceuticalSulfotransferases

Identifiers

PMID12439736
OpenAlexW2000861116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.