Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12439712›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of cancer2002

Alcohol, tobacco and breast cancer--collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 58,515 women with breast cancer and 95,067 women without the disease.

N Hamajima, K Hirose, K Tajima, T Rohan, E E Calle, C W Heath, R J Coates, J M Liff, R Talamini, N Chantarakul and 212 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readCommentMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of cancer, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 366 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
366citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
23.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

366 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,065 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Risk factors for breast cancer in women: an update review.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Alcohol warning label perceptions: Emerging evidence for alcohol policy.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2015
    Trial
  19. Article
  20. Review

306 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

222 authors.

N HamajimaCancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Gibson Building, Radcliffe Infirmary, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK.
K Hirose
K Tajima
T Rohan
E E Calle
C W Heath
R J Coates
J M Liff
R Talamini
N Chantarakul
S Koetsawang
D Rachawat
A Morabia
L Schuman
W Stewart
M Szklo
C Bain
F Schofield
V Siskind
P Band
A J Coldman
R P Gallagher
T G Hislop
P Yang
L M Kolonel
A M Y Nomura
J Hu
K C Johnson
Y Mao
S De Sanjosé
N Lee
P Marchbanks
H W Ory
H B Peterson
H G Wilson
P A Wingo
K Ebeling
D Kunde
P Nishan
J L Hopper
G Colditz
V Gajalanski
N Martin
T Pardthaisong
S Silpisornkosol
C Theetranont
B Boosiri
S Chutivongse
P Jimakorn
P Virutamasen
C Wongsrichanalai
M Ewertz
H O Adami
L Bergkvist
C Magnusson
I Persson
J Chang-Claude
C Paul
D C G Skegg
G F S Spears
P Boyle
T Evstifeeva
J R Daling
W B Hutchinson
K Malone
E A Noonan
J L Stanford
D B Thomas
N S Weiss
E White
N Andrieu
A Brêmond
F Clavel
B Gairard
J Lansac
L Piana
R Renaud
A Izquierdo
P Viladiu
H R Cuevas
P Ontiveros
A Palet
S B Salazar
N Aristizabel
A Cuadros
L Tryggvadottir
H Tulinius
A Bachelot
M G Lê
J Peto
S Franceschi
F Lubin
B Modan
E Ron
Y Wax
G D Friedman
R A Hiatt
F Levi
T Bishop
K Kosmelj
M Primic-Zakelj
B Ravnihar
J Stare
W L Beeson
G Fraser
R D Bullbrook
J Cuzick
S W Duffy
I S Fentiman
J L Hayward
D Y Wang
A J McMichael
K McPherson
R L Hanson
M C Leske
M C Mahoney
P C Nasca
A O Varma
A L Weinstein
T R Moller
H Olsson
J Ranstam
R A Goldbohm
P A van den Brandt
R A Apelo
J Baens
J R de la Cruz
B Javier
L B Lacaya
C A Ngelangel
C La Vecchia
E Negri
E Marubini
M Ferraroni
M Gerber
S Richardson
C Segala
D Gatei
P Kenya
A Kungu
J G Mati
L A Brinton
R Hoover
C Schairer
R Spirtas
H P Lee
M A Rookus
F E van Leeuwen
J A Schoenberg
M McCredie
M D Gammon
E A Clarke
L Jones
A Neil
M Vessey
D Yeates
P Appleby
E Banks
V Beral
D Bull
B Crossley
A Goodill
J Green
C Hermon
T Key
N Langston
C Lewis
G Reeves
R Collins
R Doll
R Peto
K Mabuchi
D Preston
P Hannaford
C Kay
L Rosero-Bixby
Y T Gao
F Jin
J-M Yuan
H Y Wei
T Yun
C Zhiheng
G Berry
J Cooper Booth
T Jelihovsky
R MacLennan
R Shearman
Q-S Wang
C-J Baines
A B Miller
C Wall
E Lund
H Stalsberg
X O Shu
W Zheng
K Katsouyanni
A Trichopoulou
D Trichopoulos
A Dabancens
L Martinez
R Molina
O Salas
F E Alexander
K Anderson
A R Folsom
B S Hulka
L Bernstein
S Enger
R W Haile
A Paganini-Hill
M C Pike
R K Ross
G Ursin
M C Yu
M P Longnecker
P Newcomb
L Bergkvist
A Kalache
T M M Farley
S Holck
O Meirik
Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alcohol and tobacco consumption are closely correlated and published results on their association with breast cancer have not always allowed adequately for confounding between these exposures. Over 80% of the relevant information worldwide on alcohol and tobacco consumption and breast cancer were collated, checked and analysed centrally. Analyses included 58,515 women with invasive breast cancer and 95,067 controls from 53 studies. Relative risks of breast cancer were estimated, after stratifying by study, age, parity and, where appropriate, women's age when their first child was born and consumption of alcohol and tobacco. The average consumption of alcohol reported by controls from developed countries was 6.0 g per day, i.e. about half a unit/drink of alcohol per day, and was greater in ever-smokers than never-smokers, (8.4 g per day and 5.0 g per day, respectively). Compared with women who reported drinking no alcohol, the relative risk of breast cancer was 1.32 (1.19-1.45, P<0.00001) for an intake of 35-44 g per day alcohol, and 1.46 (1.33-1.61, P<0.00001) for >/=45 g per day alcohol. The relative risk of breast cancer increased by 7.1% (95% CI 5.5-8.7%; P<0.00001) for each additional 10 g per day intake of alcohol, i.e. for each extra unit or drink of alcohol consumed on a daily basis. This increase was the same in ever-smokers and never-smokers (7.1% per 10 g per day, P<0.00001, in each group). By contrast, the relationship between smoking and breast cancer was substantially confounded by the effect of alcohol. When analyses were restricted to 22 255 women with breast cancer and 40 832 controls who reported drinking no alcohol, smoking was not associated with breast cancer (compared to never-smokers, relative risk for ever-smokers=1.03, 95% CI 0.98-1.07, and for current smokers=0.99, 0.92-1.05). The results for alcohol and for tobacco did not vary substantially across studies, study designs, or according to 15 personal characteristics of the women; nor were the findings materially confounded by any of these factors. If the observed relationship for alcohol is causal, these results suggest that about 4% of the breast cancers in developed countries are attributable to alcohol. In developing countries, where alcohol consumption among controls averaged only 0.4 g per day, alcohol would have a negligible effect on the incidence of breast cancer. In conclusion, smoking has little or no independent effect on the risk of developing breast cancer; the effect of alcohol on breast cancer needs to be interpreted in the context of its beneficial effects, in moderation, on cardiovascular disease and its harmful effects on cirrhosis and cancers of the mouth, larynx, oesophagus and liver.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesAdultAgedAlcohol DrinkingBreast NeoplasmsCardiovascular DiseasesEpidemiologic StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentSmoking

Identifiers

PMID12439712
PMCPMC2562507
OpenAlexW2098723642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.