Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12438595›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2002

Effects of membrane potential and sphingolipid structures on fusion of Semliki Forest virus.

Andrey V Samsonov, Prodyot K Chatterjee, Vladimir I Razinkov, Christina H Eng, Margaret Kielian, Fredric S Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Autophagy in the light of sphingolipid metabolism.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2015
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrey V SamsonovDepartment of Molecular Biophysics and Physiology, Rush Medical College, 1653 W. Congress Parkway, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Prodyot K Chatterjee
Vladimir I Razinkov
Christina H Eng
Margaret Kielian
Fredric S Cohen
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USRush University Medical Center · USRush University · US

Funding

MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF ALPHAVIRUS ENTRY AND EXITR01GM057454 · NIGMS · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI KIELIAN, MARGARET · 1999 to 2020
$7.2M
MODEL SYSTEM FOR PHYSIOLOGICAL EXOCYTOSISR01GM027367 · NIGMS · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI COHEN, FREDRIC S · 1985 to 2009
$4.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 27367NIGMS NIH HHS GM 57454NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM027367NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells expressing the E1 and E2 envelope proteins of Semliki Forest virus (SFV) were fused to voltage-clamped planar lipid bilayer membranes at low pH. Formation and evolution of fusion pores were electrically monitored by capacitance measurements, and membrane continuity was tracked by video fluorescence microscopy by including rhodamine-phosphatidylethanolamine in the bilayer. Fusion occurred without leakage for a negative potential applied to the trans side of the planar membrane. When a positive potential was applied, leakage was severe, obscuring the observation of any fusion. E1-mediated cell-cell fusion occurred without leakage for negative intracellular potentials but with substantial leakage for zero membrane potential. Thus, negative membrane potentials are generally required for nonleaky fusion. With planar bilayers as the target, the first fusion pore that formed almost always enlarged; pore flickering was a rare event. Similar to other target membranes, fusion required cholesterol and sphingolipids in the planar membrane. Sphingosine did not support fusion, but both ceramide, with even a minimal acyl chain (C(2)-ceramide), and lysosphingomyelin (lyso-SM) promoted fusion with the same kinetics. Thus, unrelated modifications to different parts of sphingosine yielded sphingolipids that supported fusion to the same degree. Fusion studies of pyrene-labeled SFV with cholesterol-containing liposomes showed that C(2)-ceramide supported fusion while lyso-SM did not, apparently due to its positive curvature effects. A model is proposed in which the hydroxyls of C-1 and C-3 as well as N of C-2 of the sphingosine backbone must orient so as to form multiple hydrogen bonds to amino acids of SFV E1 for fusion to proceed.

Indexed as

Hydrogen BondingHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationLipid BilayersMembrane FusionMembrane PotentialsPotassiumSemliki forest virusSphingolipidsStructure-Activity RelationshipTrypan BlueViral Envelope ProteinsZincLipid BilayersPotassiumSphingolipidsTrypan BlueViral Envelope ProteinsZinc

Identifiers

PMID12438595
PMCPMC136663
OpenAlexW2136265443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.