Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12438460›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2002

The internet.

R Al-Shahi, M Sadler, G Rees, D Bateman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Internet and occupational dermatology. Quality criteria and useful links].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2004
    Article
  2. Internet resources for neurologists.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2003
    Article
  3. Internet resources for psychiatry and neuropsychiatry.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2003
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

R Al-ShahiDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK. Rustam.Al-Shahi@ed.ac.uk
M Sadler
G Rees
D Bateman

Funding

Wellcome Trust 067453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing use of email and the world wide web (WWW), by the public, academics, and clinicians-as well as the increasing availability of high quality information on the WWW-make a working knowledge of the internet important. Although this article aims to enhance readers' existing use of the internet and medical resources on the WWW, it is also intelligible to someone unfamiliar with the internet. A web browser is one of the central pieces of software in modern computing: it is a window on the WWW, file transfer protocol sites, networked newsgroups, and your own computer's files. Effective use of the internet for professional purposes requires an understanding of the best strategies to search the WWW and the mechanisms for ensuring secure data transfer, as well as a compendium of online resources including journals, textbooks, medical portals, and sites providing high quality patient information. This article summarises these resources, available to incorporate into your web browser as downloadable "Favorites" or "Bookmarks" from www.jnnp.com, where there are also freely accessible hypertext links to the recommended sites.

Indexed as

Attitude to ComputersComputer LiteracyNeurologyNeurosurgeryForecastingHumansInternetLondonPublishing

Identifiers

PMID12438460
PMCPMC1757350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.