Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12434963›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2002

Primary care mental health workers: models of working and evidence of effectiveness.

Peter Bower

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Cluster randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of primary care mental health workers.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007
    Trial
  4. Internet interventions · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Psychological Prophylaxis: An Integrated Psychological Services Program in Trauma Care.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. An international perspective on youth mental health: the role of primary health care and collaborative care models.Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent · 2012
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Implementing the role of the primary care mental health worker: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter BowerNational Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester. peter.bower@man.ac.uk
University of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The NHS Plan proposed the creation of a new role in primary care to assist with the management of common mental health problems: the primary care mental health worker (PCMHW). However, it is not clear how PCMHWs should be employed to be most effective. Current literature concerning different models of mental health care is reviewed. This suggests that four key dimensions are of relevance: the types of patients that PCMHWs will manage; the degree to which PCMHWs will work autonomously, or as part of a system of care; at what stage in patients' illness trajectory they will intervene; and whether the role of PCMHWs will be related to clinical interventions, or whether they will have a wider, non-clinical role in the organisation and monitoring of care. Finally, published data concerning relevant interventions are presented. Experimental studies reporting the empirical outcomes associated with these models are reviewed in relation to four different outcomes: clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness, patient satisfaction, and access to care. The data suggest that problem-solving therapy, group psycho-education, self-help, and some models of 'collaborative care' may be highly relevant to PCMHWs. Each model provides different advantages and disadvantages in terms of the four dimensions of outcome.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesPrimary Health CareCase ManagementCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMental DisordersPatient SatisfactionProfessional RoleState MedicineTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID12434963
PMCPMC1314446
OpenAlexW2121203864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.