Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12434037›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2002

Genetics. Toward a new vocabulary of human genetic variation.

Pamela Sankar, Mildred K Cho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Race and ethnicity in genetic research.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2007
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Taking an antiracist posture in scientific publications in human genetics and genomics.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Race and ethnicity on MS presentation and disease course.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Epidemiology and Genomics of Lung Cancer.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center · 2016
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pamela SankarCenter for Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-3308, USA. sankarp@mail.med.upenn.edu
Mildred K Cho

Funding

BEYOND STIGMA--INTERPRETING GENETIC DIFFERENCER01HG002189 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SANKAR, PAMELA L · 2000 to 2003
$1.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002189NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HGO 2189-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Genetics, MedicalGenetic VariationEthnicityGenetic MarkersHumansRacial GroupsTerminology as TopicGenetic MarkersBiomedical and Behavioral ResearchGenetics and Reproduction

Identifiers

PMID12434037
PMCPMC2271140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.