Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12433330›Full record

ArticleCurrent infectious disease reports2002

Urinary Tract Infection in Pregnant Women: Old Dogmas and Current Concepts Regarding Pathogenesis.

Bogdan Nowicki

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current infectious disease reports, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bogdan NowickiUniversity of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 301 University Boulevard, Route 1062, Galveston, TX 77555-1062, USA. bnowicki@utmb.edu
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dogma is that the higher risk of pyelonephritis in pregnant women is explained entirely by anatomic/obstructive changes. If so, gestational pyelonephritis should be caused by random, nonpathogenic bacteria. Instead, gestational pyelonephritis is associated with a narrow group of genetically related Escherichia coli and virulence factors, implicating a more complex pathophysiology. Current concepts in the pathogenesis of nongestational urinary tract infections propose receptor-mediated ascending infection. A pathogen with capacity to recognize various receptors may use receptors in the lower, rather than upper urinary tract, and ascend even the lumen of renal tubules. The immune system of a pregnant mother is modified to accommodate a semiallogeneic fetus. Gestational physiologic/immune adaptations may become additional risk factors, increasing sensitivity to urogenital infection. One could argue that it is not primarily the so-called "obstruction," but rather specific changes in the immune system and host receptors that act in concert with--or become exploited by--bacterial virulence that allow for infection in pregnancy to occur.

Identifiers

PMID12433330
OpenAlexW1980786463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.