ReviewInternational journal of hematology2002
The therapy of myelofibrosis: targeting pathogenesis.
Review in International journal of hematology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM) encompasses the diagnoses of agnogenic myeloid metaplasia (idiopathic myelofibrosis), as well as the advanced phases of polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia (post polycythemic and post thrombocythemia myeloid metaplasia, respectively). MMM is a clonal, hematopoietic stem cell disorder in which neither the pathogenesis, nor a broadly applicable effective therapy have been described. Clinically, these patients experience progressive marrow replacement by fibrotic tissue, ineffective hematopoiesis, problematic cytopenia's, significant hepato-splenomegaly, extramedullary hematopoiesis, profound constitutional symptoms, and a risk of blastic transformation. Historically, therapies have been targeted at palliating symptoms (i.e. splenectomy, transfusions, hydroxyurea, erythropoietin, androgens, localized radiotherapy). Stem cell transplantation appears promising, but is often toxic and not broadly applicable due to co-morbidities and age of MMM patients. Non-myeloablative approaches to conditioning may broaden the applicability of stem cell transplantation in MMM, yet results to date are preliminary. Although a definitive molecular abnormality responsible for the pathogenesis of MMM has not been described, much has been learned about the aberrant expression of pro-fibrotic cytokines and the presence of increased angiogenesis in MMM. These pathogenetic insights have led to a series of pilot clinical trials with therapeutic agents targeting aberrantly expressed cytokines (and possibly angiogenesis) including Thalidomide (alone or in combination), Etanercept, and STI-571. Amongst these later agents Thalidomide has demonstrated the most promise (palliating disease associated cytopenia's), whereas the TNF-alpha inhibitor Etanercept has aided with MMM associated constitutional symptoms. Although these later trials have been helpful in a subset of patients, no agent to date has led to solid complete responses in MMM across the spectrum of disease manifestations. Further insights into the pathogenetic mechanisms responsible for myeloproliferation (aberrant cell signaling pathways, apoptotic resistance, other) are necessary to guide selection and testing of the expanding number of novel anti-neoplastic agents in chronic myeloid disorders and MMM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.