ReviewInternational journal of hematology2002
Views on the pathophysiology of aplastic anaemia.
Review in International journal of hematology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Cytogenetic study is not essential in patients with aplastic anemia.American journal of blood research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aplastic anaemia seems to be predominantly a defect of the stem cell rather than the stroma, though abnormalities of the microenvironment may co-exist. There is highly suggestive evidence that the stem cell is the target of an immune attack, though the main evidence remains the response to immunosuppression with antilymphocyte globulin and cyclosporin. The stem cell defect remains even after recovery of the peripheral blood counts and the AA marrow is a fertile environment for the emergence of abnormal clones, particularly PNH. However, it has recently become apparent that there is an overlap with the myelodysplastic syndromes and clones of monosomy 7 and trisomy 8 amongst others are not uncommon in aplastic anaemia. Recent work has suggested that the emergence of a clone of monosomy 7 cells carries a poor prognosis, whereas trisomy 8 has a good prognosis particularly in response to cyclosporin. However, the setting in which monosomy 7 arises may affect the phenotypic expression. The immune targeting of stem cells may be associated with increased apoptosis in aplastic anaemia, in part mediated by fas expression, but not exclusively. Understanding the pathophysiology of AA should help to improve and perhaps target therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.