Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12426387›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2002

Editing site recognition and nucleotide insertion are separable processes in Physarum mitochondria.

Elaine M Byrne, Angela Stout, Jonatha M Gott

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. When you can't trust the DNA: RNA editing changes transcript sequences.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2011
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elaine M ByrneCenter for RNA Molecular Biology, Case Western Reserve University, 2109 Adelbert Road, School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Angela Stout
Jonatha M Gott

Funding

TRANSCRIPTION AND INSERTIONAL RNA EDITING IN PHYSARUMR01GM054663 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GOTT, JONATHA MARY · 1998 to 2006
$2.2M
TRANSCRIPTION AND INSERTIONAL RNA EDITING IN PHYSARUMR55GM054663 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GOTT, JONATHA MARY · 1996 to 1996
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 54663NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM054663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insertional RNA editing in Physarum polycephalum is a complex process involving the specific addition of non-templated nucleotides to nascent mitochondrial transcripts. Since all four ribonucleotides are substrates for the editing activity(s), both the site of insertion and the identity of the nucleotide to be added at a particular position must be specified, but the signals for these events have yet to be elucidated. Here we report the occurrence of sporadic errors in RNAs synthesized in vitro. These mistakes, which include omission of encoded nucleotides as well as misinsertions, occur only on templates that support editing. The pattern of these misediting events indicates that editing site recognition and nucleotide addition are separable events, and that the recognition step involves features of the mitochondrial template that are required for editing. The larger deletions lack all templated nucleotides between editing sites, suggesting that the transcription/editing apparatus can "jump" from one insertion site to another, perhaps mediated by interactions with editing determinants, while smaller omissions most likely reflect misalignment of the transcript upon resumption of templated RNA synthesis.

Indexed as

RNA EditingAnimalsBase PairingDNA, ComplementaryDNA, ProtozoanMitochondriaPhysarum polycephalumRNA, ProtozoanTemplates, GeneticDNA, ComplementaryDNA, ProtozoanRNA, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID12426387
PMCPMC137202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.