Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12426325›Full record

ReviewJournal of bacteriology2002

On the high value of low standards.

Elbert Branscomb, Paul Predki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of bacteriology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparative Genomic Analysis ofInternational journal of genomics · 2019
    Article
  2. TheCurrent tropical medicine reports · 2016
    Article
  3. Value of a newly sequenced bacterial genome.World journal of biological chemistry · 2014
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Scaffolder - software for manual genome scaffolding.Source code for biology and medicine · 2012
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Phototroph genomics ten years on.Photosynthesis research · 2008
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elbert BranscombDOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California. Protometrix, Inc., Guilford, Connecticut.
Paul Predki

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialSequence Analysis, DNAQuality Control

Identifiers

PMID12426325
PMCPMC135412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.