Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12425871›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2002

Vasoconstriction and vasodilation in erectile physiology.

Thomas M Mills

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas M MillsDepartment of Physiology, Medical College of Georgia, 1120 15th Street, Augusta, GA 30912-3000, USA. tmills@mail.mcg.edu
Augusta University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated that vasoconstriction in the erectile vasculature of the penis is mediated in part by RhoA/Rho-kinase signaling. However, this constrictor activity must be overcome to permit the vasodilation essential for erection. We hypothesize that the primary action of nitric oxide and other agents that cause penile erection is inhibition of the RhoA/Rho-kinase pathway, thereby allowing vasodilation and erection. This hypothesis, as well as experiments using hypogonadal and hypertensive animal models, are discussed in terms of the potential clinical value of Rho-kinase inhibitors for the treatment of erectile dysfunction.

Indexed as

VasoconstrictionVasodilationErectile DysfunctionHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMalePenisProtein Serine-Threonine Kinasesrho-Associated KinasesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine Kinasesrho-Associated Kinases

Identifiers

PMID12425871
OpenAlexW2030032618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.