Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12421773›Full record

Trial reportEmergency medicine journal : EMJ2002

The MRC CRASH Trial: study design, baseline data, and outcome in 1000 randomised patients in the pilot phase.

P Edwards, B Farrell, G Lomas, R Mashru, N Ritchie, I Roberts, P Sandercock, J Wasserberg, D Yates, CRASH Trial Pilot Study Collaborative Group

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Neuro-ophthalmic deficits after head trauma.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2013
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Treating head injuries.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2002
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

P EdwardsCRASH Trial Coordinating Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Phil.Edwards@LSHTM.ac.uk
B Farrell
G Lomas
R Mashru
N Ritchie
I Roberts
P Sandercock
J Wasserberg
D Yates
CRASH Trial Pilot Study Collaborative Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo test the design and feasibility of a large scale multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of a high dose corticosteroid infusion after head injury. To assess whether large numbers of patients could be enrolled and treated within eight hours from injury and then followed up at six months.

methodsRandomised placebo controlled multicentre trial of a 48 hour corticosteroid infusion after significant head injury. All head injured adults who were observed while in hospital to have GCS of 14 or less (out of a maximum score of 15), and who were within eight hours of the injury, were eligible for trial entry. Analysis of baseline and outcome data (for both treatment groups combined) for 1000 patients enrolled in the pilot phase of the MRC CRASH Trial.

resultsFifty two hospitals in 14 countries participated in the pilot phase, recruiting an average of one patient per hospital per month. Of the 1000 randomised patients, 330 (33%) had mild head injury, 289 (29%) had moderate head injury, and 381 (38%) had severe head injury. Seven hundred and nine (71%) patients were randomised within three hours of injury. Outcome at two weeks from injury was known for 991 (99%) patients, of whom 170 (17%) patients died. At the time of writing, six month follow up for the first 500 patients was nearly complete. Vital status was known for 465 (93%) of the 500 patients, of whom 97 (21%) had died. Functional status based on the Glasgow Outcome Scale was known for 438 (88%) of the 500 patients: 21% were dead, 17% were severely disabled, 22% were moderately disabled, and 34% had made a good recovery.

conclusionsThe trial procedures proved practicable and a wide variety of patients were recruited in the emergency department within eight hours of injury. Using simple outcome measures, large numbers of patients can be successfully followed up.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionCraniocerebral TraumaFeasibility StudiesFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMethylprednisoloneMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePilot ProjectsGlucocorticoidsMethylprednisolone

Identifiers

PMID12421773
PMCPMC1756291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.