Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12421116›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2002

Glatiramer acetate: a review of its use in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Dene Simpson, Stuart Noble, Caroline Perry

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Adaptive immune responses in CNS autoimmune disease: mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2013
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Assessing cost-effectiveness in the management of multiple sclerosis.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2009
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Therapeutic vaccines in autoimmunity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2004
    Review
  15. Mechanism of action of glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis and its potential for the development of new applications.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2004
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dene SimpsonAdis International Limited, Mairangi Bay, Auckland, New Zealand. demail@adis.co.nz
Stuart Noble
Caroline Perry

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledGlatiramer acetate is a synthetic copolymer composed of a random mixture of four amino acids that modifies the immune response that results in the CNS inflammation, demyelination and axonal loss characteristic of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). In three randomised, double-blind trials in patients with RRMS, subcutaneous glatiramer acetate 20 mg/day was significantly more effective than placebo for the primary outcome measure of each trial (mean relapse rate, proportion of relapse-free patients and number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions on magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] scans). The mean relapse rate was significantly reduced at endpoint (approximately one-third less) in the two larger trials (the US pivotal trial [primary endpoint] and the European/Canadian study [tertiary endpoint]) in patients receiving glatiramer acetate compared with those receiving placebo. The rate was 78% less for glatiramer acetate than placebo patients in the pilot trial that investigated a slightly different patient population. Glatiramer acetate significantly decreased disease activity and burden of disease, as assessed in the European/Canadian study using a range of MRI measures. Patients with RRMS treated with glatiramer acetate in the US trial were significantly more likely to experience improved disability (whereas placebo recipients were more likely to experience worsening disability) and their overall disability status was significantly improved compared with placebo recipients. Data from the active-treatment extension of the US trial suggest that glatiramer acetate has sustained clinical benefits up to 8 years. Glatiramer acetate was generally well tolerated; the most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events were localised injection-site reactions and transient post-injection systemic reactions. Both reactions were generally mild and self limiting but were responsible for the majority of withdrawals from treatment (up to 6.5 and 3.5%, respectively). Glatiramer acetate is not associated with the influenza-like syndrome or neutralising antibodies that are reported in patients treated with interferon-beta for RRMS. The cost effectiveness of glatiramer acetate has yet to be definitively determined as assessment of available data is confounded by very different models, data sources and assumptions.

conclusionGlatiramer acetate has shown efficacy in well controlled clinical trials in patients with RRMS; it reduces relapse rate and decreases MRI-assessed disease activity and burden. It is generally well tolerated and is not associated with the influenza-like symptoms and formation of neutralising antibodies seen with the interferons-beta. Based on available data and current management guidelines, glatiramer acetate is a valuable first-line treatment option for patients with RRMS.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicClinical Trials as TopicDisease ProgressionGlatiramer AcetateHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingPeptidesQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeAdjuvants, ImmunologicGlatiramer AcetatePeptides

Identifiers

PMID12421116
OpenAlexW2058058932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.