ReviewDrugs2002
Influenza vaccinations: who needs them and when?
Review in Drugs, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel respiratory infectious diseases in Korea.Yeungnam University journal of medicine · 2020Article
- Post-exposure influenza prophylaxis with oseltamivir: cost effectiveness and cost utility in families in the UK.PharmacoEconomics · 2006Article
- Fatal influenza A infection with Staphylococcus aureus superinfection in a 49-year-old woman presenting as sudden death.International journal of legal medicine · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Influenza vaccination programmes should aim at reducing the burden from influenza among those who need it most. The primary aim of this literature review is to identify who should receive priority in influenza vaccination programmes. Risk factors for severe post-influenza complications include immune-related factors, such as ageing or the presence of immune-suppression, respiratory tract disease, proneness to exacerbation of concomitant high-risk disease, potential adverse effects associated with long-term drug use or residence in closed communities with high transmission rate. When given annually in autumn, inactivated trivalent influenza vaccines can reduce severe complications from influenza among persons aged 65 years or older by 30-60%. Among children aged less than 7 years, notably those with asthma, the occurrence of otitis media or acute respiratory disease is reduced by 20-75% with vaccination. In addition, vaccination of residents of long-term care facilities and their personnel leads to a 42% reduction in mortality among patients. However, uncertainty remains about whether influenza vaccination can reduce complications from influenza among the large group of older children and persons of working-age with high-risk disease. To further increase the impact of prevention strategies, the development and application of clinical prediction rules to estimate absolute risks of post-influenza complications should be studied in relation to optimal vaccine delivery strategies. Furthermore, adequately powered studies should be conducted to demonstrate possible effectiveness of vaccination in reducing post-influenza complications among older children and working-age adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.