Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2002
A phase I dose-escalation study of etoposide continuous infusion added to busulphan/cyclophosphamide as conditioning prior to autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Finding the Optimal Conditioning Regimen for Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma Patients Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective Comparison of BEAM and High-Dose ICE.Turkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2016Article
- Long-term follow-up of busulfan, etoposide, and nimustine hydrochloride (ACNU) or melphalan as conditioning regimens for childhood acute leukemia and lymphoma.International journal of hematology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Relapse of the primary disease remains the predominant cause of death following bone marrow transplantation for high-risk haematological malignancies. Improved supportive care and patient selection have resulted significant improvements in toxicity with standard conditioning regimens. Further dose intensification to reduce the risk of relapse may therefore be feasible. We determined the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of a 5-day continuous infusion (CI) of etoposide when added to oral busulphan 16 mg/kg and intravenous cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg (Bu/Cy) as conditioning in 44 autograft and 18 allograft recipients at high risk of relapse. The major toxicity of escalating doses of etoposide was oral and gastro-intestinal mucositis, reflected by a statistically significant increase in the requirement for total parenteral nutrition in both autografts and allograft recipients. Time to neutrophil and platelet recovery, opiate analgesia requirements, and duration of hospitalization were not affected by etoposide dose escalation. The MTD in autograft recipients was 300 mg/m(2)/day (1500 mg/m(2) total dose), and 100 mg/m(2)/day (500 mg/m(2) total dose) for allograft recipients. Mucositis and hepatotoxicity were more frequent in allograft recipients, suggesting that methotrexate may have contributed to the lower tolerable dose in these patients. As a consequence, further dose escalation may not be possible in heavily pre-treated patients undergoing allogeneic transplantation. Conversely, high dose CI etoposide can be added with relative safety to Bu/Cy in autograft recipients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.