Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12420193›Full record

ArticleJournal of human hypertension2002

Compliance to hypertension guidelines in clinical practice: a multicentre pilot study in Italy.

C Cuspidi, I Michev, L Lonati, A Vaccarella, M Cristofari, G Garavelli, G Palumbo, S Meani, G Leonetti, F Magrini and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The neglected role of the electrocardiogram in the diagnostic work-up of hypertensive patients: a study in clinical practice.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2013
    Article
  9. Article
  10. The use of three strategies to improve quality of care at a national level.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2012
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Explicit and implicit evaluation of physician adherence to hypertension guidelines.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2007
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

C CuspidiInstitute of Internal Medicine and Centro di Fisiologia Clinica e Ipertensione, Università di Milano and Ospedale Maggiore Milano, Italy. dhipertensione@libero.it
I Michev
L Lonati
A Vaccarella
M Cristofari
G Garavelli
G Palumbo
S Meani
G Leonetti
F Magrini
A Zanchetti
Lombardy Regional Section of Italian Society of Hypertension
Centro Studi Luca d’Agliano · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITOspedale Maggiore · ITAzienda Ospedaliera di Valtellina e Valchiavenna · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Civile di Legnano · ITIstituti Ospitalieri di Cremona · ITIstituto Nazionale di Riposo e Cura per Anziani · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic approach to recently diagnosed hypertensive patients by primary care physicians in Italy and to find out whether general practitioners manage these patients according to 1999 WHO/ISH guideline recommendations. In total, 228 consecutive patients (117 men and 111 women, mean age 51+/-12 years) with recently diagnosed hypertension (<2 years) referred for the first time to six outpatient hypertension centres throughout Italy were included in the study. The primary care physicians' approach was evaluated during the specialist visit by a specific questionnaire containing detailed questions about diagnostic work-up and treatment made at the time of the first diagnosis of hypertension. At the study visit, 71% of the patients were on treatment with antihypertensive drugs and 18.7% of them had blood pressure (BP) values lower than 140/90 mmHg. A complete clinical and laboratory evaluation according to the minimum work-up suggested by the guidelines had been carried out in only 10% of the patients. A full physical examination had been performed in 60% of the patients, electrocardiogram in 54%, serum total cholesterol in 53%, glucose in 49%, creatinine in 49%, urine analysis in 46%, potassium in 42%, and fundus oculi in 19%. Additional investigations such as ambulatory BP monitoring, echocardiogram, carotid ultrasonogram, and microalbuminuria had been carried out in a minority of patients (21, 18, 9, and 3%, respectively). The impact on hypertension guidelines on patients' management in everyday primary care practice appears marginal. Thus, our findings indicate that the majority of general practitioners manage hypertensive patients according to a simple BP-based approach rather than a more integrated approach based on global risk stratification.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherencePractice Guidelines as TopicChi-Square DistributionFemaleHumansHypertensionItalyMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID12420193
OpenAlexW2314978381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.