Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12417673›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2002

Functional dissection of neuroanatomical loci regulating ethanol sensitivity in Drosophila.

Aylin R Rodan, John A Kiger, Ulrike Heberlein

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. TheGenome research · 2021
    Article
  10. Flying Together:International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Amnesiac Is Required in the Adult Mushroom Body for Memory Formation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. I Believe I Can Fly!: Use of Drosophila as a Model Organism in Neuropsychopharmacology Research.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aylin R RodanDepartment of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0452, USA.
John A Kiger
Ulrike Heberlein
Society for Neuroscience · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

GENES THAT REGULATE ETHANOL RESPONSES IN DROSOPHILAR01AA010035 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SHAH, NIRAO MAHESH · 1995 to 2014
$4.4M
NIAAA NIH HHS AA10035NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA010035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethanol has complex but similar effects on behavior in mammals and the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. In addition, genetic and pharmacological approaches have implicated the cAMP pathway in the regulation of ethanol-induced behaviors in both flies and rodents. Here we examine the neuroanatomical loci that modulate ethanol sensitivity in Drosophila by targeting the expression of an inhibitor of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) to specific regions in the fly's brain. Expression of the inhibitor in most brain regions or in muscle has no effect on behavior. In contrast, inhibition of PKA in a relatively small number of cells, possibly neurosecretory cells, in the fly's brain is sufficient to decrease sensitivity to the incoordinating effects of ethanol. Additional brain areas are, however, also involved. The mushroom bodies, brain structures where cAMP signaling is required for olfactory classical conditioning, are dispensable for the regulation of ethanol sensitivity. Finally, different behavioral effects of ethanol, motor incoordination and sedation, appear to be regulated by PKA function in distinct brain regions. We conclude that the regulation of ethanol-induced behaviors by PKA involves complex interactions among groups of cells that mediate either increased or reduced sensitivity to the acute intoxicating effects of ethanol.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBehavior, AnimalCatalytic DomainCyclic AMP-Dependent Protein KinasesDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterDrug ResistanceEthanolGene ExpressionGenes, ReporterHydroxyureaLarvaLocomotionMaleCyclic AMP-Dependent Protein KinasesDNA-Binding ProteinsEthanolGAL4 protein, S cerevisiaeHydroxyureaProtein SubunitsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID12417673
PMCPMC6758036
OpenAlexW1931217601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.