Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12414775›Full record

ArticleClinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology2002

Leishmania major-like antigen for specific and sensitive serodiagnosis of human and canine visceral leishmaniasis.

Rosângela Barbosa-De-Deus, Marcos Luíz Dos Mares-Guia, Adriane Zacarias Nunes, Kátia Morais Costa, Roberto Gonçalves Junqueira, Wilson Mayrink, Odair Genaro, Carlos Alberto Pereira Tavares

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Quantification of Soluble or Insoluble Fractions ofInternational journal of analytical chemistry · 2020
    Article
  8. Prevalidation of an ELISA for Detection of a New Clinical Entity:International journal of analytical chemistry · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparative immune study on cutaneous leishmaniasis patients with single and multiple sores.Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rosângela Barbosa-De-DeusDepartamento de Farmácia, UFOP, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Fundação Ezequiel Dias, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Marcos Luíz Dos Mares-Guia
Adriane Zacarias Nunes
Kátia Morais Costa
Roberto Gonçalves Junqueira
Wilson Mayrink
Odair Genaro
Carlos Alberto Pereira Tavares
Ezequiel Dias Foundation · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An antigen (LMS) prepared from Leishmania major-like promastigotes was used in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the diagnosis of human and dog visceral leishmaniasis. The results were compared with those from the indirect immunofluorescent antibody test (IFAT). A total of 1822 canine sera were tested, including sera from dogs with visceral leishmaniasis, transmissible venereal tumors, ehrlichiosis, rickettsiosis, or Chagas' disease and sera from healthy dogs. The antigen was also tested with 227 samples of human sera, including sera from patients with visceral, cutaneous, or diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis and from noninfected individuals, as well as sera from patients with Chagas' disease, toxoplasmosis, rickettsiosis, hepatitis B, schistosomiasis, ascaridiasis, malaria, rheumatoid factor, leprosy and rheumatoid factor, tuberculosis, or leprosy. All dogs and all human patients had a clinical and/or serological and/or parasitological diagnosis. For detecting antibodies in sera from dogs with leishmaniasis, the antigen showed a sensitivity of 98%, specificity of 95%, and concordance of 93% and when used for detecting antibodies in human sera presented a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 100%, and concordance of 92%. Comparison between ELISA and IFAT demonstrated that ELISA using the LMS antigen yielded more reliable results than IFAT. The LMS antigen displayed no cross-reactivity with sera from patients or dogs that had any of the other diseases tested.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, ProtozoanDog DiseasesDogsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectHumansLeishmania majorLeishmaniasis, VisceralSensitivity and SpecificitySerologic TestsAntigens, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID12414775
PMCPMC130090
OpenAlexW2116708519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.