Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12414682›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2002

Depletion-mediated red blood cell aggregation in polymer solutions.

Björn Neu, Herbert J Meiselman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Björn NeuDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1333 San Pablo Street, MMR 626, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA. neu@usc.edu
Herbert J Meiselman

Funding

SICKLE CELL CENTERP60HL048484 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI JOHNSON, CAGE S · 1993 to 2002
$3.9M
HEMORHEOLOGY STUDIES RELATED TO IN VIVO BLOOD FLOWR01HL015722 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MEISELMAN, HERBERT J · 1985 to 2008
$2.3M
HEMORHEOLOGY STUDIES RELATED TO IN VIVO BLOOD FLOWR37HL015722 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MEISELMAN, HERBERT J · 1989 to 1998
–
NHLBI NIH HHS HL 15722NHLBI NIH HHS HL 48484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymer-induced red blood cell (RBC) aggregation is of current basic science and clinical interest, and a depletion-mediated model for this phenomenon has been suggested; to date, however, analytical approaches to this model are lacking. An approach is thus described for calculating the interaction energy between RBC in polymer solutions. The model combines electrostatic repulsion due to RBC surface charge with osmotic attractive forces due to polymer depletion near the RBC surface. The effects of polymer concentration and polymer physicochemical properties on depletion layer thickness and on polymer penetration into the RBC glycocalyx are considered for 40 to 500 kDa dextran and for 18 to 35 kDa poly (ethylene glycol). The calculated results are in excellent agreement with literature data for cell-cell affinities and with RBC aggregation-polymer concentration relations. These findings thus lend strong support to depletion interactions as the basis for polymer-induced RBC aggregation and suggest the usefulness of this approach for exploring interactions between macromolecules and the RBC glycocalyx.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiophysical PhenomenaBiophysicsCell AggregationErythrocytesHumansOsmosisPolymersStatic ElectricityTemperaturePolymers

Identifiers

PMID12414682
PMCPMC1302334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.