Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12409530›Full record

ArticleOccupational and environmental medicine2002

Ineffective disability management by doctors is an obstacle for return-to-work: a cohort study on low back pain patients sicklisted for 3-4 months.

J R Anema, A M Van Der Giezen, P C Buijs, W Van Mechelen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Undergraduate teaching of occupational medicine in European schools of medicine.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2014
    Article
  18. Optimal communication from occupational physicians to GPs: a cross-sectional survey.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Work disability prevention research: current and future prospects.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J R AnemaTNO Work and Employment, Netherlands IWI, formerly AS/tri, Netherlands EMGO-Institute and Department of Social Medicine, VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands. h.anema@arbeid.tno.nl
A M Van Der Giezen
P C Buijs
W Van Mechelen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo determine obstacles for return-to-work in disability management of low back pain patients sicklisted for 3-4 months.

methodsA cohort of 467 low back pain patients sicklisted for 3-4 months was recruited. A questionnaire was sent to their occupational physicians (OPs) concerning the medical management, obstacles to return-to-work, and the communication with treating physicians.

resultsThe OPs of 300 of 467 patients participated in this study. In many cases OPs regarded the clinical waiting period (43%), duration of treatment (41%), and view (25%) of the treating physicians as obstacles for return-to-work. Psychosocial obstacles for return-to-work such as mental blocks, a lack of job motivation, personal problems, and conflicts at work were all mentioned much less frequently by OPs. In only 19% of the patients was there communication between OP and treating physician. Communication almost always entailed an exchange of information, and less frequently an attempt to harmonise the management policy. Surprisingly communication was also limited, when OPs felt that the waiting period (32%), duration of treatment (30%), and view (28%) of treating physicians inhibited return-to-work. Communication was significantly associated with the following obstacles for return-to-work: passivity with regard to return-to-work and clinical waiting period; adjusted odds ratios were 3.35 and 2.23, respectively.

conclusionsMedical management of treating physicians is often an obstacle for return to work regarding low back pain patients sicklisted for 3-4 months, in the opinion of OPs. Nevertheless communication between OPs and the treating physicians in disability management of these patients is limited. More attention to prevention of absenteeism and bilateral communication is needed in medical courses.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEmploymentAdolescentAdultClinical CompetenceCohort StudiesFamily PracticeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInterprofessional RelationsLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedOccupational Health ServicesProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID12409530
PMCPMC1740234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.