ArticleNucleic acids research2002
Designing gene libraries from protein profiles for combinatorial protein experiments.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modifying inhibitor specificity for homologous enzymes by machine learning.The FEBS journal · 2026Article
- SwiftLib: rapid degenerate-codon-library optimization through dynamic programming.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- Structure-based redesign of the binding specificity of anti-apoptotic Bcl-x(L).Journal of molecular biology · 2013Article
- Designing specific protein-protein interactions using computation, experimental library screening, or integrated methods.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2012Review
- Optimizing nucleotide sequence ensembles for combinatorial protein libraries using a genetic algorithm.Nucleic acids research · 2010Article
- A focused antibody library for selecting scFvs expressed at high levels in the cytoplasm.BMC biotechnology · 2007Article
- Oligonucleotide-directed site-specific integration of high complexity libraries into ssDNA templates.Nucleic acids research · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein combinatorial libraries provide new ways to probe the determinants of folding and to discover novel proteins. Such libraries are often constructed by expressing an ensemble of partially random gene sequences. Given the intractably large number of possible sequences, some limitation on diversity must be imposed. A non-uniform distribution of nucleotides can be used to reduce the number of possible sequences and encode peptide sequences having a predetermined set of amino acid probabilities at each residue position, i.e., the amino acid sequence profile. Such profiles can be determined by inspection, multiple sequence alignment or physically-based computational methods. Here we present a computational method that takes as input a desired sequence profile and calculates the individual nucleotide probabilities among partially random genes. The calculated gene library can be readily used in the context of standard DNA synthesis to generate a protein library with essentially the desired profile. The fidelity between the desired profile and the calculated one coded by these partially random genes is quantitatively evaluated using the linear correlation coefficient and a relative entropy, each of which provides a measure of profile agreement at each position of the sequence. On average, this method of identifying such codon frequencies performs as well or better than other methods with regard to fidelity to the original profile. Importantly, the method presented here provides much better yields of complete sequences that do not contain stop codons, a feature that is particularly important when all or large fractions of a gene are subject to combinatorial mutation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.