ArticleNucleic acids research2002
Simultaneous determination of different DNA sequences by mass spectrometric evaluation of Sanger sequencing reactions.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional analysis of the congenital heart disease‑associated GATA4 H436Y mutation in vitro.Molecular medicine reports · 2019Article
- Digital detection of genetic mutations using SPC-sequencing.Genome research · 2004Article
- Oral Actinomyces isolates forming red colonies on brain heart blood agar can bee unambiguously classified as A odontolyticus by macroscopic examination.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
All currently available DNA sequencing protocols rest fundamentally upon the homogeneity of the template. In this paper we describe the parallel DNA sequencing of various templates in one sample by a combination of the Sanger method and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometric analysis of the products. PCR-amplified hypervariable 16S rDNA fragments of the bacterium Escherichia coli DF1020 and cDNA of the 6-phosphofructo-1-kinase isoenzymes (PFK-1, EC 2.7.1.11) in rat brain were chosen as model systems for essentially heterogeneous templates. Avoiding cloning of the inhomogeneous PCR products we were able to read three sequences for both the 16S rDNA fragment of E.coli DF1020 and the cDNA of 6-phosphofructo-1-kinase from the peak lists of the Sanger sequencing reactions. Short sequences with a length between 21 and 25 nt were sufficient to reflect the heterogeneity of the 16S rDNA genes in E.coli and the existence of three isoenzymes of PFK-1 in rat brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.