ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2002
Improved monitoring of cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation by an ultrasensitive plasma DNA PCR assay.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection of human cytomegalovirus DNA in various blood components after liver transplantation.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2014Article
- Clinical significance of low cytomegalovirus DNA levels in human plasma.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2012Article
- Lack of evidence for systemic cytomegalovirus reactivation in maintenance hemodialysis patients.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2011Article
- Quantification of DNA in plasma by an automated real-time PCR assay (cytomegalovirus PCR kit) for surveillance of active cytomegalovirus infection and guidance of preemptive therapy for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2008Article
- Optimization of quantitative detection of cytomegalovirus DNA in plasma by real-time PCR.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2004Article
- Monitoring of cytomegalovirus infection in solid-organ transplant recipients by an ultrasensitive plasma PCR assay.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA amplification assays in plasma have shown limited sensitivity compared to the detection of pp65 antigen in leukocytes. Our goal was to increase the sensitivity of a commercial CMV DNA PCR quantitative assay. After modification, the new assay was able to reproducibly detect 20 CMV DNA copies/ml of plasma. We compared this new ultrasensitive PCR assay with the standard PCR and the pp65 test for CMV detection and quantification in 22 consecutive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients. CMV infection or reactivation was detected in 84 of 319 (26%) samples by the ultrasensitive PCR assay compared to 38 of 319 (12%) samples by the pp65 assay (P < 0.01). All samples positive by the pp65 assay were positive by the ultrasensitive PCR, and CMV episodes were detected on average 4 days earlier and 7 days later than the first and the last pp65-positive test, respectively. In addition, during CMV episodes, the ultrasensitive assay identified positive samples that were inconsistently detected by the pp65 assay. The ultrasensitive assay was also much more sensitive than the standard PCR, with 26 versus 12% of CMV DNA-positive samples (P < 0.01). This assay improved the monitoring of CMV infection or reactivation in hematopoietic allogeneic stem cell recipients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.