ReviewDrug safety2002
Indinavir-induced retinoid-like effects: incidence, clinical features and management.
Review in Drug safety, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Chronic paronychia associated with fluconazole use in two pediatric patients with coccidioidomycosis.IDCases · 2024Article
- 1064 Nd:YAG laser for the treatment of chronic paronychia: a pilot study.Lasers in medical science · 2015Article
- Combination antiretroviral therapy and chronic HIV infection affect serum retinoid concentrations: longitudinal and cross-sectional assessments.AIDS research and therapy · 2012Article
- Prevalence and factors associated with dry skin in HIV infection: the FRAM study.AIDS (London, England) · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since 1998, many cases of antiretroviral therapy-related paronychia of the toes or fingers and ingrown toenails have been reported. Most of them were related to indinavir. Other indinavir-induced mucocutaneous disorders resembling the adverse effects of systemic retinoid therapy have also been reported. Although there is some uncertainty in the literature regarding a cause-effect relationship, results of several epidemiological and in vitro studies, together with cumulated clinical experience leave no doubt that indinavir causes a retinoid-like effect and nail alterations. Indeed, indinavir is the only antiretroviral drug that produces these disorders, although ritonavir may enhance indinavir-induced retinoid-like effects through pharmacokinetic interactions leading to increased plasma indinavir concentrations. Approximately 30% of patients receiving indinavir show two or more retinoid-like manifestations and 4-9% develop paronychia. These adverse effects are not related to other epidemiological variables such as the patient's sex, age or other risk factors or immune status. They seem to be exposure dependent and, therefore, largely dose-dependent. Chronic paronychia is considered generally to be caused by contact irritants and candidal infection. Nevertheless, indinavir is currently the most frequent cause of chronic or recurrent paronychia in HIV-infected patients. In addition, retinoid-like manifestations such as cutaneous xerosis and cheilitis are frequent mucocutaneous adverse effects related to indinavir. The exact mechanism of indinavir-induced retinoid-like effects is unclear. Hypotheses for pathogenesis include interference with retinoid metabolism by enhancing the retinoic acid signalling pathway, or by increasing retinoic acid synthesis, or by reducing cytochrome p450-mediated retinoic acid oxidative metabolism. Replacement of therapy by an antiretroviral regimen not containing indinavir, while retaining other protease inhibitors and lamivudine, resolves retinoid-like manifestations without recurrences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.