ReviewJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2002
Gender selection: cultural and religious perspectives.
Review in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cross border reproductive care (CBRC): a growing global phenomenon with multidimensional implications (a systematic and critical review).Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2018Pooled it
- Regulations Governing Sex Selection in Bangladesh: Implications of Islamic Law and Ethics.Asian bioethics review · 2026Article
- Mapping ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT).Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Review
- The effect of religious background on the attitude towards sex selection.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2019Article
- Ethical considerations in sex selection.Journal of education and health promotion · 2015Review
- The Israeli National Committee for sex selection by pre-implantation genetic diagnosis: a novel approach (2005-2011).Israel journal of health policy research · 2014Article
- Effect of combined density gradient centrifugation on X- and Y- sperm separation and chromatin integrity.Iranian journal of reproductive medicine · 2012Article
- Preimplantation sex selection demand and preferences among infertility patients in Midwestern United States.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2007Article
- Chances to Have A Boy after Gender Selection by Pre-Implantation Genetic Screening Are Reduced in Couples with only Girls and without A Boy Sired by The Male Partner.International journal of fertility & sterilityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo review the current developments in the field of preconceptual sex selection and to discuss the cultural and religious perspectives as that accompany the scientific progress.
designA survey of the major publications in Judaism, Christianity and Islam regarding the issue of gender selection. Examination of current methods of preconceptual gender selection revealed that in vivo methods such as timing of intercourse, the use of ovulation induction medications, and artificial insemination do not appear to affect the sex ratio to a clinically significant degree. In vitro separation of X- and Y-bearing spermatozoa by gradient techniques have been reported to alter significantly the sex ratio at birth. However, these trials were not controlled, and molecular biological techniques could not validate that these methods indeed change the Y- to X bearing spermatozoa ratio sufficiently for clinical use. Nevertheless recent scientific advances have made highly reliable preconceptual sex selection possible by using preimplantation diagnosis (PGD) or sperm separation by flow cytometry combined with AIH or IVF. At present, these methods have been used to avoid sex-linked disorders. Both involve the invasive procedure of IVF and thus are held by most as inappropriate for nonmedical indications. However, improvement in flow cytometry output of sexed spermatozoa might provide in the near future sufficient sorted gametes for artificial insemination. It may be that in the near future, an improvement in flow cytometry output of sexed spermatozoa will provide sufficient sorted gametes for artificial insemination. In such a case, the medical community will be forced to take a stand, whether this reliable noninvasive method of sexing will be allowed for social purposes and even if the practice of PGD should be allowed for nonmedical indications.
conclusionThe requirement for a man to procreate by having a minimum of two children-a boy and a girl-is obligatory according to Jewish law. According to both schools, Beit Shamai and Beit Hillel, in order to fulfill the obligation of procreation at least one son is required. Therefore the application of sex preselection for nonmedical indications may by of practical importance using the method of sperm separation or sex selection of pre-embryo by PGD. According to Christian view, especially the one of the Catholic Church, gender preselection even for medical indications is forbidden. Islamic legal viewpoint is that fetal sex selection is lawful when it is practiced on an individual basis, to fulfill the wish of a married couple to have a boy or a girl through available medical means.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.