Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12406778›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2002

Transcript analysis of genes encoding a family 61 endoglucanase and a putative membrane-anchored family 9 glycosyl hydrolase from Phanerochaete chrysosporium.

Amber Vanden Wymelenberg, Stuart Denman, Diane Dietrich, Jennifer Bassett, Xiaochun Yu, Rajai Atalla, Paul Predki, Ulla Rudsander, Tuula T Teeri, Daniel Cullen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genome sequence ofBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Amber Vanden WymelenbergDepartment of Bacteriology. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.
Stuart Denman
Diane Dietrich
Jennifer Bassett
Xiaochun Yu
Rajai Atalla
Paul Predki
Ulla Rudsander
Tuula T Teeri
Daniel Cullen
Forest Products Laboratory · USKTH Royal Institute of Technology · SEJoint Genome Institute · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phanerochaete chrysosporium cellulase genes were cloned and characterized. The cel61A product was structurally similar to fungal endoglucanases of glycoside hydrolase family 61, whereas the cel9A product revealed similarities to Thermobifida fusca Cel9A (E4), an enzyme with both endo- and exocellulase characteristics. The fungal Cel9A is apparently a membrane-bound protein, which is very unusual for microbial cellulases. Transcript levels of both genes were substantially higher in cellulose-grown cultures than in glucose-grown cultures. These results show that P. chrysosporium possesses a wide array of conventional and unconventional cellulase genes.

Indexed as

Transcription, GeneticBacterial ProteinsCellulaseCloning, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataPhanerochaeteBacterial Proteinscel9A protein, PseudomonasCellulase

Identifiers

PMID12406778
PMCPMC129927
OpenAlexW2007978623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.