ArticleAtencion primaria2002
[Economic evaluation of a new selective COX-2 NSAID, rofecoxib, in a real practice context].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the economic and health consequences of the use of a new COX-2 anti-inflammatory drug.
designCost-effectiveness analysis by modelling three options for prescribing non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) in patients diagnosed with arthrosis and undergoing long-term NSAID treatment. Option 1: NSAID prescription without gastric protection for low-risk patients, and with gastric protection for patients running a medium or high risk of developing complications (current procedure). Option 2: exclusive prescription of rofecoxib (25 mg/day) for all patients (high and low risk). Option 3: single-therapy rofecoxib (25 mg/day) prescription for patients sensitive to combined treatment (NSAIDs and gastric protection) due to the risk of complications. In each case, resources and expected clinical benefits were accounted for by the calculation of the cost of avoidance of each moderate or high gastro-intestinal side-effect (GISE) (symptomatic ulcer or complication) avoided. The direct economic impact on the centre of passing from option 1 to any of the other two options was calculated. SETTINGS AND
participantsThe study, conducted in the Barceloneta Primary Care Centre, included in its modelling the 124 patients diagnosed with arthrosis who received NSAIDs continuously during the year 2000.
resultsOption 2 supposed avoiding 1.5 cases of GISE (0.5 symptomatic ulcers and 0.9 serious complications), to an additional cost of 336 566.78 euros. Each case avoided would cost 24,641.50 euros; and each serious case avoided 38,464.79 euros. Option 3 avoided 0.25 cases of serious complication, at an additional cost of 9,015.18 euros. Avoiding one case would cost 37,262.75 euros.
conclusionsThe overall health benefits arising from the universal or partial introduction of a selective COX-2 inhibitor NSAID involve a unit cost of 24,040.48 or 36,060.73 euros, depending on the option. The impact on the Centre s pharmaceutical budget would increase by 1.3% under option 2, and by 0.35% under option 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.