Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12406358›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2002

Impoverished diabetic patients whose doctors facilitate their participation in medical decision making are more satisfied with their care.

Carol Golin, M Robin DiMatteo, Naihua Duan, Barbara Leake, Lillian Gelberg

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Patient-physician agreement on the content of CHD prevention discussions.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2011
    Trial
  6. Patient-centered communication: do patients really prefer it?Journal of general internal medicine · 2004
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Delivering bad news: patient's perspective and opinions.Patient preference and adherence · 2018
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Role of decision aids in orthopaedic surgery.World journal of orthopedics · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Carol GolinDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Carol_Golin@unc.edu
M Robin DiMatteo
Naihua Duan
Barbara Leake
Lillian Gelberg
University of California, Los Angeles · USNeurobehavioral Systems · USUniversity of California, Riverside · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGreater participation in medical decision making is generally advocated for patients, and often advocated for those with diabetes. Although some studies suggest that diabetic patients prefer to participate less in decision making than do healthy patients, the empirical relationship between such participation and diabetic patients' satisfaction with their care is currently unknown. We sought to characterize the relationship between aspects of diabetic patients' participation in medical decision making and their satisfaction with care.

designCross-sectional observational study.

settingA general medical county hospital-affiliated clinic.

participantsOne hundred ninety-eight patients with type 2 diabetes. MAIN MEASURES: Interviews conducted prior to the doctor visit assessed patients' desire to participate in medical decision making, baseline satisfaction (using a standardized measure), and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Postvisit interviews of those patients assessed their visit satisfaction and perception of their doctor's facilitation of patient involvement in care. A discrepancy score was computed for each subject to reflect the difference between the previsit stated desire regarding participation and the postvisit report of their experience of participation.

resultsOverall, patients reported low postvisit satisfaction relative to national standards (mean of 70 on a 98-point scale). Patients perceived a high level of facilitation of participation (mean 88 on a 100-point scale). Facilitation of participation and the discrepancy score both independently predicted greater visit satisfaction. In particular, a 13-point (1 SD) increase in the perceived facilitation score resulted in a 12-point (0.87 SD) increase in patient satisfaction, and a 1.22 point increase (1 SD) in the discrepancy score (the extent to which the patient was allowed more participation than, at previsit, he or she desired) resulted in a 6-point (0.5 SD) increase in the satisfaction score, even after controlling for initial desire to participate. For women, but not for men, physician facilitation of participation was a positive predictor of satisfaction; for men, but not women, desire to participate was a significant positive predictor of visit satisfaction.

conclusionClinicians may feel reassured that encouraging even initially reluctant patients with diabetes to participate in medical decision making may be associated with increased patient satisfaction. Greater patient participation has the potential to improve diabetic self-care because of the likely positive effect of patient satisfaction on adherence to treatment. Further research to assess the prospective effects of enhancing physician facilitation of patient participation is likely to yield important information for the effective treatment of chronically ill patients.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Patient ParticipationPatient SatisfactionCommunicationCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPhysician-Patient RelationsSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID12406358
PMCPMC1495130
OpenAlexW2046937332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.