ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2002
Antiretroviral pharmacokinetics in the paediatric population: a review.
Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00312091 (A Phase I/II Comparative Pharmacokinetic Study of the Fixed-Dose Combination), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase I/II Comparative Pharmacokinetic Study of the Fixed-Dose Combination (FDC) of Stavudine (d4T), Lamivudine (3TC), and Nevirapine (NVP) as GPO-VIR Pediatric Chewable Tablets Versus the Individual Liquid Formulations in HIV Infected Children 6 Months and Older to Less Than 13 Years of Age in Thailand
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Influence of CYP2B6 516G>T polymorphism and interoccasion variability (IOV) on the population pharmacokinetics of efavirenz in HIV-infected South African children.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2012Trial
- Pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir crushed versus whole tablets in children.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2011Trial
- Pharmacokinetic study of once-daily versus twice-daily abacavir and lamivudine in HIV type-1-infected children aged 3-<36 months.Antiviral therapy · 2010Trial
- Article
- Pharmacometric characterization of efavirenz developmental pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics in HIV-infected children.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2014Article
- Nevirapine exposure with WHO pediatric weight band dosing: enhanced therapeutic concentrations predicted based on extensive international pharmacokinetic experience.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2012Article
- Antiretroviral drugs in pediatric HIV-infected patients: pharmacokinetic and practical challenges.Paediatric drugs · 2011Review
- Pharmacokinetics of anti-tuberculosis drugs in children.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2011Review
- Population pharmacokinetics of lopinavir in combination with rifampicin-based antitubercular treatment in HIV-infected South African children.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2010Article
- Adherence to high activity antiretrovial therapy (HAART) in pediatric patients infected with HIV: issues and interventions.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2007Review
- Nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in children.Clinical drug investigation · 2007Review
- Underdosing of antiretrovirals in UK and Irish children with HIV as an example of problems in prescribing medicines to children, 1997-2005: cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006Article
- Application and impact of population pharmacokinetics in the assessment of antiretroviral pharmacotherapy.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2005Review
- Pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected children.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2005Review
- Clinical pharmacology: special safety considerations in drug development and pharmacovigilance.Drug safety · 2004Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Characteristics unique to paediatric pharmacotherapy should be considered when treating children infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Processes of growth and development in the paediatric patient can significantly affect drug absorption and disposition. Immature renal function, altered hepatic enzyme activity and differences in drug absorption lead to variations in systemic exposure of antiretrovirals among children. Paediatric patients are also subject to unique circumstances that may prevent adherence to antiretroviral regimens. The pharmacokinetics of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors differ significantly among preterm infants, full-term infants and older children. Decreased hepatic glucuronidation activity in neonates results in pharmacokinetic differences in zidovudine disposition when compared with older children. Didanosine, stavudine and lamivudine are renally eliminated, thus resulting in differences among young children with immature renal function. Pharmacokinetic data for non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in children are limited. Decreased elimination of nevirapine among neonates has been observed, primarily due to decreased enzymatic activity. Pharmacokinetic differences across age groups have been noted for efavirenz, but no formal assessments have been conducted in children weighing less than 10kg. Protease inhibitors are metabolised by the cytochrome P450 enzyme system, which is not fully developed in younger children. Decreased metabolism can result in elevated plasma concentrations, thereby increasing the chance of toxicity. Unfortunately, few studies exist evaluating the pharmacokinetics of antiretrovirals in children. As a result, dosage selection of antiretrovirals in children often occurs without adequate data. As the life expectancy of HIV-infected children increases, use of antiretrovirals to prevent disease progression also increases. If prevention of treatment failure continues to be the goal of antiretroviral therapy, the pharmacokinetics of antiretrovirals in children need to be assessed early in the drug development process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.